Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulation

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Dhruv
dc.contributor.authorYe, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorCampiti, Vincent J.
dc.contributor.authorRubel, Kolin E.
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Thomas S.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Arthur W.
dc.contributor.authorShipchandler, Taha Z.
dc.contributor.authorSim, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorBurgin, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.authorIlling, Elisa A.
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jae Hong
dc.contributor.authorTing, Jonathan Y.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T15:03:36Z
dc.date.available2020-08-17T15:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-11
dc.description.abstractObjective: After significant restrictions initially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, otolaryngologists have begun resuming normal clinical practice. However, the risk of SARS-CoV2 transmission to health care workers through aerosolization and airborne transmission during rhinologic surgery remains incompletely characterized. The objective of this study was to quantify the number concentrations of aerosols generated during rhinologic surgery with and without interventions involving 3 passive suction devices. Study Design: Cadaver simulation. Setting: Dedicated surgical laboratory. Subjects and Methods: In a simulation of rhinologic procedures with and without different passive suction interventions, the concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 mm were quantified with an optical particle sizer. Results: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery with and without microdebrider, high-speed powered drilling, use of an ultrasonic aspirator, and electrocautery all produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols of various sizes (P \.05). Powered drilling, ultrasonic aspirator, and electrocautery generated the highest concentration of aerosols, predominantly submicroparticles \1 mm. All interventions with a suction device were effective in reducing aerosols, though the surgical smoke evacuation system was the most effective passive suction method in 2 of the 5 surgical conditions with statistical significance (P \.05). Conclusion. Significant aerosol concentrations were produced in the range of 0.30 to 10.0 mm during all rhinologic procedures in this cadaver simulation. Rhinologic surgery with a passive suction device results in significant mitigation of generated aerosols.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationSharma, D., Ye, M. J., Campiti, V. J., Rubel, K. E., Higgins, T. S., Wu, A. W., Shipchandler, T. Z., Sim, M. W., Burgin, S. J., Illing, E. A., Park, J. H., & Ting, J. Y. (2020). Mitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulation. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820951169en_US
dc.identifier.issn0194-5998en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-6817en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23622
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0194599820951169en_US
dc.relation.journalOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectRhinologic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectSuction Devicesen_US
dc.subjectAerosolen_US
dc.titleMitigation of Aerosols Generated During Rhinologic Surgery: A Pandemic-Era Cadaveric Simulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharma2020Mitigation.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: