Breast Implant Reconstruction in the Ptotic Patient: Evaluation of Wise and Vertical Skin Sparing Mastectomy

dc.contributor.authorHolohan, M. Margaret
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Stephanie M.
dc.contributor.authorNewsom, Keeley
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Alex
dc.contributor.authorFan, Betty
dc.contributor.authorImeokparia, Folasade O.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Carla S.
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, Kandice K.
dc.contributor.authorLester, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorHassanein, Aladdin H.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-13T08:32:21Z
dc.date.available2024-12-13T08:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-12
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Post-mastectomy reconstruction in patients with severe breast ptosis can be challenging. Traditionally, a skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with a circumareolar incision or a horizontal elliptical extension results in a long, horizontally-oriented scar in the central breast. The Wise pattern SSM with an inferiorly-based dermal flap addresses skin redundancy and provides added vascularized implant coverage in ptotic patients with macromastia. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in ptotic patients undergoing SSM with Wise pattern and a modified vertical technique which also uses de-epithelialized excess skin under the incision. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients that underwent SSM using a Wise or vertical skin reducing technique. The Wise pattern was performed using an inferiorly-based dermal flap and the vertical method used a laterally-based dermal flap covering the implant/tissue expander (TE). Results: SSM with the use of autoderm was performed in 42 patients (67 breasts) using either the Wise (n = 49 breasts) or vertical (n = 18 breasts) method. Both groups had similar BMI (35.4). The prepectoral plane was used in 93.5% of Wise pattern patients and all vertical patients. All cases of seroma and hematoma occurred in the Wise pattern group (10.2%). Mastectomy skin necrosis requiring unplanned return to surgery for debridement occurred in 20.4% of those undergoing Wise pattern SSM and 11.1% undergoing the vertical pattern (p = 0.49). Conclusion: Severely ptotic patients undergoing SSM have a high risk of skin necrosis. A dermal flap under the closure has the advantage of vascularized tissue reinforcing the wound in implant based reconstruction. The vertical pattern SSM using a laterally-based dermal flap may be a safe, simple alternative to the Wise pattern in select patients.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationHolohan MM, Diaz SM, Newsom K, et al. Breast Implant Reconstruction in the Ptotic Patient: Evaluation of Wise and Vertical Skin Sparing Mastectomy. Plast Surg (Oakv). Published online March 12, 2024. doi:10.1177/22925503241234940
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/44999
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSage
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/22925503241234940
dc.relation.journalPlastic Surgery
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPtosis
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectMastectomy
dc.subjectImplant
dc.subjectTissue expander
dc.subjectReconstuction
dc.titleBreast Implant Reconstruction in the Ptotic Patient: Evaluation of Wise and Vertical Skin Sparing Mastectomy
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562139/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Holohan2024Breast-PP.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: