Consumer factors predicting level of treatment response to illness management and recovery
dc.contributor.author | White, Dominique A. | |
dc.contributor.author | McGuire, Alan B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Roudebush, Richard L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Luther, Lauren | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Adrienne | |
dc.contributor.author | Phalen, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | McGrew, John H. | |
dc.contributor.department | Psychology, School of Science | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-22T20:23:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-22T20:23:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify consumer-level predictors of level of treatment response to illness management and recovery (IMR) to target the appropriate consumers and aid psychiatric rehabilitation settings in developing intervention adaptations. METHOD: Secondary analyses from a multisite study of IMR were conducted. Self-report data from consumer participants of the parent study (n = 236) were analyzed for the current study. Consumers completed prepost surveys assessing illness management, coping, goal-related hope, social support, medication adherence, and working alliance. Correlations and multiple regression analyses were run to identify self-report variables that predicted level of treatment response to IMR. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that goal-related hope significantly predicted level of improved illness self-management, F(1, 164) = 10.93, p < .001, R2 = .248, R2 change = .05. Additionally, we found that higher levels of maladaptive coping at baseline were predictive of higher levels of adaptive coping at follow-up, F(2, 180) = 5.29, p < .02, R2 = .38, R2 change = .02. Evidence did not support additional predictors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Previously, consumer-level predictors of level of treatment response have not been explored for IMR. Although 2 significant predictors were identified, study findings suggest more work is needed. Future research is needed to identify additional consumer-level factors predictive of IMR treatment response in order to identify who would benefit most from this treatment program. (PsycINFO Database Record | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | White, D. A., McGuire, A. B., Luther, L., Anderson, A. I., Phalen, P., & McGrew, J. H. (2017). Consumer factors predicting level of treatment response to illness management and recovery. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 40(4), 344–353. doi:10.1037/prj0000284 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/19436 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1037/prj0000284 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Illness management and recovery | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictors | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychosocial intervention | en_US |
dc.subject | Severe mental illness | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychiatric rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.title | Consumer factors predicting level of treatment response to illness management and recovery | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |