Trends in Shoulder Stabilization Techniques Used in the United States Based on a Large Private-Payer Database

dc.contributor.authorRiff, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Rachel M.
dc.contributor.authorSumner, Shelby
dc.contributor.authorFriel, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorBach, Bernard R., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Nikhil N.
dc.contributor.authorRomeo, Anthony A.
dc.contributor.departmentOrthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-06T18:10:41Z
dc.date.available2018-06-06T18:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-20
dc.description.abstractBackground: Arthroscopic stabilization is the most broadly used surgical procedure in the United States for management of recurrent shoulder instability. Latarjet coracoid transfer has been considered a salvage surgical procedure for failed arthroscopic repairs or cases of significant glenoid bone loss; however, with recent literature suggesting reduced risk of recurrent instability with Latarjet, several surgeons have advocated its broader utilization as a primary operation for treatment of shoulder instability. Purpose: To determine trends in shoulder stabilization techniques used in the United States. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a publicly available national insurance database was performed to identify shoulder stabilization procedures performed over 9 years (2007-2015). The following Current Procedural Terminology codes were searched: 29806 (arthroscopic stabilization), 23455 (open capsulolabral repair), 23466 (open capsular shift), 23462 (Latarjet coracoid transfer), and 23460 (open anterior capsulorrhaphy with other bone block augmentation). Outcomes of interest included (1) trends in the use of each technique throughout the study interval, (2) age and sex distributions of patients undergoing each technique, and (3) regional predilections for the use of each technique. Results: Arthroscopic stabilization was the most broadly used shoulder stabilization procedure in the database (87%), followed by open Bankart (7%), Latarjet (3.2%), open capsular shift (2.6%), and alternative bone block procedure (0.8%). Throughout the study period, the incidence of arthroscopic stabilization and Latarjet increased (8% and 15% per year, respectively); the incidence of open capsular shift remained relatively constant; and the incidence of open Bankart decreased (9% per year). Arthroscopic stabilization, open Bankart, and Latarjet each had similar sex-based distributions (roughly 70% male), while open capsular shift and alternative bone block were relatively more common in females (54% and 50% male, respectively). The incidence of arthroscopic stabilization and Latarjet were greatest in the South and lowest in the Northeast. Conclusion: Arthroscopic stabilization remains the most commonly utilized stabilization technique in the United States. The use of the Latarjet procedure is steadily increasing and now rivals open Bankart stabilization among the most commonly used open stabilization techniques.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationRiff, A. J., Frank, R. M., Sumner, S., Friel, N., Bach, B. R., Verma, N. N., & Romeo, A. A. (2017). Trends in Shoulder Stabilization Techniques Used in the United States Based on a Large Private-Payer Database. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5(12), 2325967117745511. http://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117745511en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/16365
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/2325967117745511en_US
dc.relation.journalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectLatarjeten_US
dc.subjectDislocationen_US
dc.subjectShoulderen_US
dc.subjectShoulder instabilityen_US
dc.subjectShoulder stabilizationen_US
dc.titleTrends in Shoulder Stabilization Techniques Used in the United States Based on a Large Private-Payer Databaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1177_2325967117745511.pdf
Size:
322.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: