The influence of hardness and chemical composition on enamel demineralization and subsequent remineralization

dc.contributor.authorAlkattan, Rana
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Frank
dc.contributor.authorTang, Qing
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George J.
dc.contributor.authorAndo, Masatoshi
dc.contributor.departmentCariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T18:29:43Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T18:29:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.description.abstractObjectives The objectives were to investigate the hardness and chemical composition of sound, demineralized and pH-cycled bovine enamel and determine their influence on demineralization and remineralization behavior. Methods Ninety-four, 5 × 5 × 2-mm bovine enamel specimens were demineralized using three different times [(24 h (n = 33), 48 h (n = 30), 96 h (n = 31)]. The specimens were then pH-cycled using either 367 ppm F sodium fluoride or deionized water. Knoop hardness (HK) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (measured elements: Ca, P, F, C, Mg, N) were performed at three stages (sound, after demineralization, after pH-cycling) and transverse microradiography was performed after demineralization and pH-cycling. Comparisons were determined by ANOVA. Results Results showed that HK, integrated mineral loss and lesion depth were significantly different between stages, demineralization times and treatments. The weight% of F at the surface was significantly affected by treatment, irrespective of demineralization time, while the Ca:P ratio of the enamel remained stable even after de- and remineralization protocols. The F in fluoride groups and the artificial saliva in non-fluoride groups were both able to induce enamel remineralization, indicating the protective effect of salivary pellicle against demineralization even in the absence of fluoride. Conclusions Harder specimens and those with greater surface F weight% were less susceptible to demineralization and were more likely to remineralize. However, the amount of surface Ca and P did not influence de- or remineralization behavior.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationAlkattan, R., Lippert, F., Tang, Q., Eckert, G. J., & Ando, M. (2018). The influence of hardness and chemical composition on enamel demineralization and subsequent remineralization. Journal of Dentistry, 75, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/19333
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.002en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectenamelen_US
dc.subjectbovineen_US
dc.subjecthardnessen_US
dc.titleThe influence of hardness and chemical composition on enamel demineralization and subsequent remineralizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Alkattan_2018_influence.pdf
Size:
459.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: