Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Literature Review

dc.contributor.authorDesai, Virendra R.
dc.contributor.authorGadgil, Nisha
dc.contributor.authorSaad, Shahbaz
dc.contributor.authorRaskin, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorLam, Sandi K.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurological Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-30T18:48:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-30T18:48:05Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.description.abstractBackground Improving value in healthcare means optimizing outcomes and minimizing costs. The emerging pay-for-performance era requires understanding of the effect of healthcare services on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pediatric and surgical subspecialties have yet to fully integrate HRQoL measures into practice. The present study reviewed and characterized the HRQoL outcome measures across various pediatric neurosurgical diagnoses. Methods A literature review was performed by searching PubMed and Google Scholar with search terms such as “health-related quality of life” and “pediatric neurosurgery” and then including the specific pathologies for which a HRQoL instrument was found (e.g., “health-related quality of life” plus “epilepsy”). Each measurement was evaluated by content and purpose, relative strengths and weaknesses, and validity. Results We reviewed 68 reports. Epilepsy, brain tumor, cerebral palsy, spina bifida, hydrocephalus, and scoliosis were diagnoses found in reported studies that had used disease-specific HRQoL instruments. Information using general HRQoL instruments was also reported. Internal, test–retest, and/or interrater reliability varied across the instruments, as did face, content, concurrent, and/or construct validity. Few instruments were tested enough for robust reliability and validity. Significant variability was found in the usage of these instruments in clinical studies within pediatric neurosurgery. Conclusions The HRQoL instruments used in pediatric neurosurgery are currently without standardized guidelines and thus exhibit high variability in use. Clinicians should support the development and application of these methods to optimize these instruments, promote standardization of research, improve performance measures to reflect clinically modifiable and meaningful outcomes, and, ultimately, lead the national discussion in healthcare quality and patient-centered care.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationDesai, V. R., Gadgil, N., Saad, S., Raskin, J. S., & Lam, S. K. (2019). Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Literature Review. World Neurosurgery, 122, 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.194en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20717
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.194en_US
dc.relation.journalWorld Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjecthealth-related quality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectneurosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectpediatricen_US
dc.titleMeasures of Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Literature Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Desai_2019_measures.pdf
Size:
444.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: