A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds

dc.contributor.authorHooker, Edmond A.
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Steven
dc.contributor.authorGray, Larry
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, Cynthia
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-24T08:00:51Z
dc.date.available2025-06-24T08:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-26
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hospital beds are potential reservoirs of bacteria in hospitals. Preventing contamination of the bed and providing a cleaner surface should help prevent hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). Most hospital beds are cleaned between patients (terminal cleaning) using quaternary ammonia compounds (quats). Objective: The study had two objectives: identify levels of bacterial contamination on beds (including the mattress and bed deck) and evaluate a new launderable cover. Methods: Hospital beds on a bariatric surgery ward were randomized to either receive or not receive a launderable cover (Trinity Guardion, Batesville, IN). Bacterial counts on the surface of the mattress, the bed deck, and the launderable cover were then collected using Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plates (Petrifilm™, 3M™, St. Paul, MN, USA) (Petrifilm™) at three time periods (before patient use, after discharge, and after terminal cleaning). Standard hospital linen was used in all rooms. Results: The launderable cover (n = 28) was significantly cleaner prior to patient use than were the cleaned mattresses (n = 38) (1.1 CFU/30 cm2 vs. 7.7 CFU/30 cm2; p = 0.0189). The mattresses without launderable covers became significantly contaminated during use (7.7 CFU/30 cm2 on admission vs. 79.1 CFU/30 cm2 after discharge; p < 0.001). The mattresses with launderable covers did not become contaminated (3.0 CFU/30 cm2 on admission vs. 2.5 CFU/30 cm2 at discharge; p = 0.703). After terminal cleaning, the mattress surface contamination decreased to 12.8 CFU/30 cm2 (median 3 CFU/30 cm2; SD 7.8), but the bed deck was more contaminated (6.7 CFU/30 cm2 after discharge compared to 30.9 CFU/30 cm2 after terminal cleaning; p = 0.031). Conclusions: Terminal cleaning fails to eliminate bacteria from the surface of the hospital mattress. The launderable cover provides a cleaner surface than does terminal cleaning with quats, and the cover protects the bed from contamination during use.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationHooker EA, Allen S, Gray L, Kaufman C. A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1(1):27. Published 2012 Jul 26. doi:10.1186/2047-2994-1-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/48932
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/2047-2994-1-27
dc.relation.journalAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectHospital beds
dc.subjectBacteria
dc.subjectContamination
dc.subjectHospital-acquired infections (HAIs)
dc.titleA randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hooker2012Randomized-CCBY.pdf
Size:
238.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: