A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds
dc.contributor.author | Hooker, Edmond A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Allen, Steven | |
dc.contributor.author | Gray, Larry | |
dc.contributor.author | Kaufman, Cynthia | |
dc.contributor.department | Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-24T08:00:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-24T08:00:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-07-26 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Hospital beds are potential reservoirs of bacteria in hospitals. Preventing contamination of the bed and providing a cleaner surface should help prevent hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). Most hospital beds are cleaned between patients (terminal cleaning) using quaternary ammonia compounds (quats). Objective: The study had two objectives: identify levels of bacterial contamination on beds (including the mattress and bed deck) and evaluate a new launderable cover. Methods: Hospital beds on a bariatric surgery ward were randomized to either receive or not receive a launderable cover (Trinity Guardion, Batesville, IN). Bacterial counts on the surface of the mattress, the bed deck, and the launderable cover were then collected using Petrifilm™ Aerobic Count Plates (Petrifilm™, 3M™, St. Paul, MN, USA) (Petrifilm™) at three time periods (before patient use, after discharge, and after terminal cleaning). Standard hospital linen was used in all rooms. Results: The launderable cover (n = 28) was significantly cleaner prior to patient use than were the cleaned mattresses (n = 38) (1.1 CFU/30 cm2 vs. 7.7 CFU/30 cm2; p = 0.0189). The mattresses without launderable covers became significantly contaminated during use (7.7 CFU/30 cm2 on admission vs. 79.1 CFU/30 cm2 after discharge; p < 0.001). The mattresses with launderable covers did not become contaminated (3.0 CFU/30 cm2 on admission vs. 2.5 CFU/30 cm2 at discharge; p = 0.703). After terminal cleaning, the mattress surface contamination decreased to 12.8 CFU/30 cm2 (median 3 CFU/30 cm2; SD 7.8), but the bed deck was more contaminated (6.7 CFU/30 cm2 after discharge compared to 30.9 CFU/30 cm2 after terminal cleaning; p = 0.031). Conclusions: Terminal cleaning fails to eliminate bacteria from the surface of the hospital mattress. The launderable cover provides a cleaner surface than does terminal cleaning with quats, and the cover protects the bed from contamination during use. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hooker EA, Allen S, Gray L, Kaufman C. A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1(1):27. Published 2012 Jul 26. doi:10.1186/2047-2994-1-27 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/48932 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1186/2047-2994-1-27 | |
dc.relation.journal | Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Hospital beds | |
dc.subject | Bacteria | |
dc.subject | Contamination | |
dc.subject | Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) | |
dc.title | A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds | |
dc.type | Article |