Differences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status

dc.contributor.authorLaily, Alfu
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Robert
dc.contributor.authorGabhart, Kaitlyn M.
dc.contributor.authorNephew, Lauren D.
dc.contributor.authorChristy, Shannon M.
dc.contributor.authorVadaparampil, Susan T.
dc.contributor.authorGiuliano, Anna R.
dc.contributor.authorKasting, Monica L.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T15:09:59Z
dc.date.available2024-06-11T15:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-09
dc.description.abstractProviders' recommendation is among the strongest predictors to patients engaging in preventive care. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare providers' Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening recommendation quality between high-risk and average-risk patients to determine if providers are universally recommending HCV screening, regardless of risk behaviors. This cross-sectional survey of 284 Indiana providers in 2020 assessed provider characteristics, HCV screening recommendation practices (strength, presentation, frequency, timeliness), self-efficacy, and barriers to recommending HCV screening. T-test and Chi-square compared recommendation practices for high-risk and average-risk patients. Prevalence ratios were calculated for variables associated with HCV recommendation strength comparing high-risk and average-risk patients. Logistic regression analyses examined factors associated with HCV recommendation strength for high- and average-risk patients, with odds ratios. Compared to average-risk patients, high-risk patients received higher proportion of HCV recommendations that were strong (70.4 % v. 42.4 %), routine (61.9 % v. 55.6 %), frequent (37.7 % v. 28 %), and timely (74.2 % v. 54.9 %) (P-values < 0.001). Compared to average-risk patients, providers with high-risk patients had a lower percentage of giving a strong recommendation if they were nurse practitioner (PR = 0.49). For high-risk patients, providers with higher self-efficacy (aOR = 2.16;95 %CI = 0.99-4.69) had higher odds, while those with higher perceived barriers (aOR = 0.19;95 %CI = 0.09-0.39) and those with an internal medicine specialty compared to family medicine (aOR = 0.22;95 %CI = 0.08-0.57) had lower odds of giving a strong recommendation. These data suggest providers are not universally recommending HCV screening for all adults regardless of reported risk. Future research should translate these findings into multilevel interventions to improve HCV screening recommendations regardless of patient risk status.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationLaily A, Duncan R, Gabhart KM, et al. Differences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status. Prev Med Rep. 2024;38:102602. Published 2024 Jan 9. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102602
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/41418
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102602
dc.relation.journalPreventive Medicine Reports
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectAverage risk
dc.subjectHepatitis C virus
dc.subjectHigh risk
dc.subjectProviders
dc.subjectRecommendation
dc.subjectScreening
dc.titleDifferences in Provider Hepatitis C Virus Screening Recommendations by Patient Risk Status
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Laily2024Differences-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
531.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: