Underrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002–2017)

dc.contributor.authorWiley, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Brian E.
dc.contributor.authorGrannis, Shaun J.
dc.contributor.authorMenachemi, Nir
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T18:43:22Z
dc.date.available2023-03-16T18:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Biomedical informatics attracts few underrepresented racial minorities (URMs) into PhD programs. We examine graduation trends from 2002 to 2017 to determine how URM representation has changed over time. We also examine academic job placements by race and identify individual and institutional characteristics associated with URM graduates being successfully placed in academic jobs. Materials and methods: We analyze a near census of all research doctoral graduates from US-accredited institutions, surveyed at graduation by the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. Graduates of biomedical informatics-related programs were identified using self-reported primary and secondary disciplines. Data are analyzed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions. Results: During the study period, 2426 individuals earned doctoral degrees in biomedical informatics-related disciplines. URM students comprised nearly 12% of graduates, and this proportion did not change over time (2002-2017). URMs included Hispanic (5.7%), Black (3.2%), and others, including multi-racial and indigenous American populations (2.8%). Overall, 82.3% of all graduates accepted academic positions at the time of graduation with significantly more Hispanic graduates electing to go into academia (89.2%; P < .001). URM graduates were more likely to be single (OR = 1.38; P < .05), have a dependent (1.95; P < .01), and not receive full tuition remission (OR = 1.37; P = .05) as a student. URM graduates accepting an academic position were less likely to be a graduate of a private institution (OR = 0.70; P < .05). Discussion and conclusion: The proportion of URM candidates among biomedical informatics doctoral graduates has not increased over time and remains low. In order to improve URM recruitment and retention within academia, leaders in biomedical informatics should replicate strategies used to improve URM graduation rates in other fields.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationWiley K, Dixon BE, Grannis SJ, Menachemi N. Underrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002-2017). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(11):1641-1647. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/31950
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jamia/ocaa206en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Associationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAcademic placementen_US
dc.subjectDoctoral trainingen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectInformaticsen_US
dc.subjectMinority groupsen_US
dc.titleUnderrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002–2017)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671637/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ocaa206.pdf
Size:
278.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: