Electronic Health Record (EHR)-Based Community Health Measures: An Exploratory Assessment of Perceived Usefulness by Local Health Departments

dc.contributor.authorComer, Karen F.
dc.contributor.authorGibson, P. Joseph
dc.contributor.authorZou, Jian
dc.contributor.authorRosenman, Marc
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Brian E.
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T15:23:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-20T15:23:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-22
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Given the widespread adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems in health care organizations, public health agencies are interested in accessing EHR data to improve health assessment and surveillance. Yet there exist few examples in the U.S. of governmental health agencies using EHR data routinely to examine disease prevalence and other measures of community health. The objective of this study was to explore local health department (LHD) professionals' perceptions of the usefulness of EHR-based community health measures, and to examine these perceptions in the context of LHDs' current access and use of sub-county data, data aggregated at geographic levels smaller than county. METHODS: To explore perceived usefulness, we conducted an online survey of LHD professionals in Indiana. One hundred and thirty-three (133) individuals from thirty-one (31) LHDs participated. The survey asked about usefulness of specific community health measures as well as current access to and uses of sub-county population health data. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine respondents' perceptions, access, and use. A one-way ANOVA (with pairwise comparisons) test was used to compare average scores by LHD size. RESULTS: Respondents overall indicated moderate agreement on which community health measures might be useful. Perceived usefulness of specific EHR-based community health measures varied by size of respondent's LHD [F(3, 88) = 3.56, p = 0.017]. Over 70% of survey respondents reported using community health data, but of those < 30% indicated they had access to sub-county level data. CONCLUSION: Respondents generally preferred familiar community health measures versus novel, EHR-based measures that are not in widespread use within health departments. Access to sub-county data is limited but strongly desired. Future research and development is needed as LHD staff gain access to EHR data and apply these data to support the core function of health assessment.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationComer, K. F., Gibson, P. J., Zou, J., Rosenman, M., & Dixon, B. E. (2018). Electronic Health Record (EHR)-Based Community Health Measures: An Exploratory Assessment of Perceived Usefulness by Local Health Departments. BMC public health, 18(1), 647. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5550-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/17793
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s12889-018-5550-2en_US
dc.relation.journalBMC public healthen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCommunity health assessmenten_US
dc.subjectCommunity health measureen_US
dc.subjectElectronic health recorden_US
dc.subjectHealth information exchangeen_US
dc.subjectPopulation healthen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.titleElectronic Health Record (EHR)-Based Community Health Measures: An Exploratory Assessment of Perceived Usefulness by Local Health Departmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
12889_2018_Article_5550.pdf
Size:
817.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: