Predictors of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
dc.contributor.author | Beran, Azizullah | |
dc.contributor.author | Aboursheid, Tarek | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Adel Hajj | |
dc.contributor.author | Nayfeh, Tarek | |
dc.contributor.author | Albunni, Hashem | |
dc.contributor.author | Vargas, Alejandra | |
dc.contributor.author | Mohamed, Mouhand F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elfert, Khaled | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaear, Mohammad | |
dc.contributor.author | Obaitan, Ite | |
dc.contributor.author | Saleem, Nasir | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Awais | |
dc.contributor.author | Gromski, Mark A. | |
dc.contributor.author | DeWitt, John M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Haddad, Mohammad | |
dc.contributor.author | Watkins, James L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fogel, Evan | |
dc.contributor.author | Easler, Jeffrey J. | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T20:58:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T20:58:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background & Aims Pancreatitis is the most common serious adverse event associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This meta-analysis aimed to precisely assess the risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods We searched electronic databases for studies that assessed risk factors for PEP after adjusting for ≥3 risk factors, including at least one pre-specified patient-related and one procedure-related risk factor, and reported the data as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and pooled adjusted ORs for risk factors reported in ≥3 studies were constructed. Results A total of 159 studies with 315,580 ERCPs were included, assessing 31 unique risk factors (20 patient-related and 11 procedure-related). Key patient-related predictors of PEP were age ≤60 years (OR, 1.81; high credibility), prior acute pancreatitis (OR, 2.59; moderate), age ≤40 years (OR, 2.33; moderate), asymptomatic choledocholithiasis (OR, 4.76; low), prior PEP (OR, 4.40; low), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR, 3.11; low), and female gender (OR, 1.70; low). Key procedure-related predictors of PEP were any guidewire passage into the pancreatic duct (PD) (OR, 2.18; high), first ERCP with a native papilla (OR, 1.91; high), endoscopic papillary balloon dilation of an intact papilla (OR, 2.91; moderate), pancreatic acinarization (OR, 4.23; low), any PD cannulation (OR, 2.73; low), pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR, 2.64; low), difficult cannulation (OR, 2.60; low), any pancreatogram (OR, 2.40; low), and precut sphincterotomy (OR, 1.98; low). Conclusions Our meta-analysis focused on adjusted risk factors to provide precise estimates of the most important risk factors for PEP. Incorporating our results into a prediction model may reliably help identify high-risk patients, optimize informed consent, and guide prevention and management strategies for PEP. | |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | |
dc.identifier.citation | Beran, A., Aboursheid, T., Ali, A. H., Nayfeh, T., Albunni, H., Vargas, A., Mohamed, M. F., Elfert, K., Shaear, M., Obaitan, I., Saleem, N., Ahmed, A., Gromski, M. A., DeWitt, J. M., Al-Haddad, M., Watkins, J. L., Fogel, E., & Easler, J. J. (2024). Predictors of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/45696 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.014 | |
dc.relation.journal | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | Author | |
dc.subject | post-ERCP pancreatitis | |
dc.subject | pancreatitis | |
dc.subject | risk factors | |
dc.title | Predictors of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | |
dc.type | Article |