The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024

dc.contributor.authorStain, Steven C.
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, Diana L.
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Timothy C.
dc.contributor.authorFreischlag, Julie A.
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Jeffrey B.
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Rachel W.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiaodong
dc.contributor.authorStefanidis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorBritt, L. D.
dc.contributor.authorBuyske, Jo
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Karen
dc.contributor.authorSachdeva, Ajit K.
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Patricia L.
dc.contributor.authorBlue Ribbon Committee II
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T17:05:55Z
dc.date.available2024-10-31T17:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjective: An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges. Background: The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education. Methods: BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds. Results: Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3. Conclusions: BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationStain SC, Ellison EC, Farmer DL, et al. The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024. Ann Surg. 2024;280(4):535-546. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/44400
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Surgery
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectDelphi technique
dc.subjectGraduate medical education
dc.subjectGeneral surgery
dc.titleThe Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stain2024Blue-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
299.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: