GroEL/ES inhibitors as potential antibiotics

dc.contributor.authorAbdeen, Sanofar
dc.contributor.authorSalim, Nilshad
dc.contributor.authorMammadova, Najiba
dc.contributor.authorSummers, Corey
dc.contributor.authorFrankson, Rochelle
dc.contributor.authorAmbrose, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Gregory G.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Peter G.
dc.contributor.authorHorwich, Arthur L.
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Eli
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Steven M.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-25T19:34:34Z
dc.date.available2017-01-25T19:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-07
dc.description.abstractWe recently reported results from a high-throughput screening effort that identified 235 inhibitors of the Escherichia coli GroEL/ES chaperonin system [Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.2014, 24, 786]. As the GroEL/ES chaperonin system is essential for growth under all conditions, we reasoned that targeting GroEL/ES with small molecule inhibitors could be a viable antibacterial strategy. Extending from our initial screen, we report here the antibacterial activities of 22 GroEL/ES inhibitors against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae. GroEL/ES inhibitors were more effective at blocking the proliferation of Gram-positive bacteria, in particular S. aureus, where lead compounds exhibited antibiotic effects from the low-μM to mid-nM range. While several compounds inhibited the human HSP60/10 refolding cycle, some were able to selectively target the bacterial GroEL/ES system. Despite inhibiting HSP60/10, many compounds exhibited low to no cytotoxicity against human liver and kidney cell lines. Two lead candidates emerged from the panel, compounds 8 and 18, that exhibit >50-fold selectivity for inhibiting S. aureus growth compared to liver or kidney cell cytotoxicity. Compounds 8 and 18 inhibited drug-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains with potencies comparable to vancomycin, daptomycin, and streptomycin, and are promising candidates to explore for validating the GroEL/ES chaperonin system as a viable antibiotic target.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationAbdeen, S., Salim, N., Mammadova, N., Summers, C. M., Frankson, R., Ambrose, A. J., … Johnson, S. M. (2016). GroEL/ES inhibitors as potential antibiotics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 26(13), 3127–3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.04.089en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11852
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.04.089en_US
dc.relation.journalBioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letteren_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectGroELen_US
dc.subjectGroESen_US
dc.subjectmolecular chaperoneen_US
dc.subjectproteostasisen_US
dc.titleGroEL/ES inhibitors as potential antibioticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abdeen_2016_GroEL.pdf
Size:
717.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: