What Should We Do Different, More, Start and Stop? Systematic Collection and Dissemination of Massage Education Stakeholder Views from the 2017 Alliance for Massage Therapy Educational Congress

dc.contributor.authorMunk, Niki
dc.contributor.authorDyson-Drake, Jasmine
dc.contributor.authorMastnardo, Diane
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T12:51:44Z
dc.date.available2019-09-19T12:51:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Future of MT and Bodywork Forum, held July 27 during the 2017 Alliance for Massage Therapy Education (AFMTE) Educational Congress in Tucson, Arizona, systematically gathered the thoughts and opinions of various massage education stakeholders through an exercise following the principles of the World Café model. Methods: Forum attendees participated in three, concurrent 30-minute Breakout Group Sessions (Rounds) in three different adjacent rooms, focused on Continuing Education, Schools, or Employment. During each session, participants rotated for 3, 2.5, 2, and 1.5 minutes between four tables, asking what should be stopped, started, done differently, or changed in massage education related to the focus topic. Participants recorded their responses in marker on large Post-it® notes (3M, Maplewood, MN). These were reviewed by each of that round's participants who awarded "importance points" to each response, with 6 blue and 3 orange dots each worth 1 and 3 points, respectively. The Post-it® notes with comments and point allocations were transcribed into a data spreadsheet and analyzed for descriptive statistics and top scoring comments from each room. Results: 85-91 attendees participated in the three breakout sessions resulting in 674 comments with 3,744 assigned value points. The top five scoring comments from each room per session (N = 45) determined stakeholder's most critical views. Stop comments made up the smallest total comments proportion (19%), yet largest top scoring comment proportion (36%)-potentially highlighting unified frustration for various massage education practices. Comparatively, Start comments made up 26% of total comments, but the smallest highest scoring proportion (18%)-perhaps suggesting stakeholders feel it more important to improve what is already being done rather than beginning new endeavors in these areas. Conclusion: Stakeholder opinions on the future of massage therapy education can be systematically gathered in large conference settings and organized, analyzed, and disseminated to inform field decision-making.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationMunk, N., Dyson-Drake, J., & Mastnardo, D. (2019). What Should We Do Different, More, Start and Stop? Systematic Collection and Dissemination of Massage Education Stakeholder Views from the 2017 Alliance for Massage Therapy Educational Congress. International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork, 12(1), 29–39.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20956
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassage Therapy Foundationen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodyworken_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectREDCapen_US
dc.subjectCommunity participatory researchen_US
dc.subjectMassage educationen_US
dc.subjectMassage policyen_US
dc.subjectMassage regulationen_US
dc.subjectMassage standardsen_US
dc.subjectMedical-based massage therapyen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic massageen_US
dc.titleWhat Should We Do Different, More, Start and Stop? Systematic Collection and Dissemination of Massage Education Stakeholder Views from the 2017 Alliance for Massage Therapy Educational Congressen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijtmb-12-29.pdf
Size:
485.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: