Understanding holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) recovery: Assessing patient expectations and understanding

dc.contributor.authorAssmus, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Matthew S.
dc.contributor.authorLarge, Tim
dc.contributor.authorKrambeck, Amy E.
dc.contributor.departmentUrology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-30T19:13:51Z
dc.date.available2023-05-30T19:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Although holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a highly effective surgery, there is a variable recovery period where patients may experience hematuria, dysuria, or urinary incontinence (UI). Despite preoperative consultation, there is a paucity of literature examining the effectiveness of physician-patient communication in preparing the patient for the postoperative recovery period. We sought to examine recovery expectations as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) metric for HoLEP. Methods: With institutional review board approval, we queried our electronic medical record and retrospective clinical registry to identify 50 consecutive patients that underwent HoLEP from November 2019 to March 2020 by two endourologists. Patients were provided questionnaires via Twistle© ≥6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and perioperative course was examined in the context of responses. Our primary objective was determining whether patients felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery process. Results: We observed a 92% (46/50) response rate, with an average patient age of 69.4 years (range 55-88). Overall, 91.3% (42/46) felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery. Additionally, 97.8% (45/46) were aware of temporary UI, with 87% having ≥1 episodes of UI after catheter removal. We found 47.8% (22/46) of patients expected UI to resolve within 30 days, while 8.6% expected >90 days of UI. All patients were aware of the risk of hematuria, with 93.5% (43/46) expecting resolution within 30 days (<7 days: 47.8%; 7-14 days: 28.3%; 15-30 days: 17.4%). Conclusions: Although surgical technique continues to improve HoLEP, ensuring adequate physician-patient communication to optimize expectations is crucial. We report patient understanding of HoLEP recovery and areas for future improvement.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationAssmus MA, Lee MS, Large T, Krambeck AE. Understanding holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) recovery: Assessing patient expectations and understanding. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16(1):E25-E31. doi:10.5489/cuaj.7328en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33359
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Associationen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5489/cuaj.7328en_US
dc.relation.journalCanadian Urological Association Journalen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectProstate surgeryen_US
dc.subjectHematuriaen_US
dc.subjectDysuriaen_US
dc.subjectUrinary incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative recoveryen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) recovery: Assessing patient expectations and understandingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937596/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
cuaj-1-e25.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: