Traumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence Study: Design and Patients, Centers, Treatments, and Outcomes

dc.contributor.authorHorn, Susan D.
dc.contributor.authorCorrigan, John D.
dc.contributor.authorBogner, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorHammond, Flora M.
dc.contributor.authorSteel, Ronald T.
dc.contributor.authorSmout, Randall J.
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Ryan S.
dc.contributor.authorDijkers, Marcel P.
dc.contributor.authorWhiteneck, Gale G.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T18:35:33Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T18:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To describe study design, patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) practice-based evidence (PBE) study and to evaluate the generalizability of the findings to the U.S. TBI inpatient rehabilitation population. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, observational study. SETTING: Ten inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2130) enrolled between October 2008 and September 2011 and admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after an index TBI injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return to acute care during rehabilitation, rehabilitation length of stay, FIM at discharge, residence at discharge, and 9 months postdischarge rehospitalization, FIM, participation, and subjective well-being. RESULTS: The level of admission FIM cognitive score was found to create relatively homogeneous subgroups for the subsequent analysis of best treatment combinations. There were significant differences in patient and injury characteristics, treatments, rehabilitation course, and outcomes by admission FIM cognitive subgroups. TBI-PBE study patients were overall similar to U.S. national TBI inpatient rehabilitation populations. CONCLUSIONS: This TBI-PBE study succeeded in capturing naturally occurring variation in patients and treatments, offering opportunities to study best treatments for specific patient impairments. Subsequent articles in this issue report differences between patients and treatments and associations with outcomes in greater detail.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationHorn, S. D., Corrigan, J. D., Bogner, J., Hammond, F. M., Seel, R. T., Smout, R. J., … Whiteneck, G. G. (2015). Traumatic Brain Injury Practice-Based Evidence Study: Design and Patients, Centers, Treatments, and Outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(8 0), S178–S196.e15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.042en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12717
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.042en_US
dc.relation.journalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectBrain injuriesen_US
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness researchen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.titleTraumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence Study: Design and Patients, Centers, Treatments, and Outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms689705.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: