Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, James C., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorZarse, Chad A.
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Molly E.
dc.contributor.authorLingeman, James E.
dc.contributor.authorMcAteer, James A.
dc.contributor.departmentAnatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-18T14:17:33Z
dc.date.available2018-10-18T14:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractGreat variability exists in the response of urinary stones to SWL, and this is true even for stones composed of the same mineral. Efforts have been made to predict stone fragility to shock waves using computed tomography (CT) patient images, but most work to date has focused on the use of stone CT number (i.e., Hounsfield units). This is an easy number to measure on a patient stone, but its value depends on a number of factors, including the relationship of the size of the stone to the resolution (i.e., the slicewidth) of the CT scan. Studies that have shown a relationship between stone CT number and failure in SWL are reviewed, and all are shown to suffer from error due to stone size, which was not accounted for in the use of Hounsfield unit values. Preliminary data are then presented for a study of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones, in which stone structure-rather than simple CT number values-is shown to correlate with fragility to shock waves. COM stones that were observed to have structure by micro CT (e.g., voids, apatite regions, unusual shapes) broke to completion in about half the number of shock waves required for COM stones that were observed to be homogeneous in structure by CT. This result suggests another direction for the use of CT in predicting success of SWL: the use of CT to view stone structure, rather than simply measuring stone CT number. Viewing stone structure by CT requires the use of different viewing windows than those typically used for examining patient scans, but much research to date indicates that stone structure can be observed in the clinical setting. Future clinical studies will need to be done to verify the relationship between stone structure observed by CT and stone fragility in SWL.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, J. C., Zarse, C. A., Jackson, M. E., Lingeman, J. E., & McAteer, J. A. (2007). Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL). AIP Conference Proceedings, 900, 326–339. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.2723592en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/17569
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAIP Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1063/1.2723592en_US
dc.relation.journalAIP Conference Proceedingsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subject43.40.Ngen_US
dc.subject81.70.Txen_US
dc.subject87.54.Hken_US
dc.subjectHounsfield uniten_US
dc.subjectComputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectKidney stonesen_US
dc.subjectMicro CTen_US
dc.subjectShock wave lithotripsyen_US
dc.titleUsing Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms942332.pdf
Size:
970.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: