Cadaveric Simulation of Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures: Analysis of Droplet Splatter Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Dhruv
dc.contributor.authorRubel, Kolin E.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorShipchandler, Taha Z.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Arthur W.
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Thomas S.
dc.contributor.authorBurgin, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.authorTing, Jonathan Y.
dc.contributor.authorIlling, Elisa A.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-29T18:06:22Z
dc.date.available2020-06-29T18:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-19
dc.description.abstractObjective The primary mode of viral transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is thought to occur through the spread of respiratory droplets. The objective of this study was to investigate droplet and splatter patterns resulting from common endoscopic endonasal procedures. Study Design Cadaver simulation series. Setting Dedicated surgical laboratory. Subjects and Methods After instilling cadaver head specimens (n = 2) with fluorescein solution, endoscopic endonasal procedures were systematically performed to evaluate the quantity, size, and distance of droplets and splatter following each experimental condition. Results There were no observable fluorescein droplets or splatter noted in the measured surgical field in any direction after nasal endoscopy, septoplasty with microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty, cold-steel functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), and all experimental conditions using an ultrasonic aspirator. Limited droplet spread was noted with microdebrider FESS (2 droplets, <1 mm in size, within 10 cm), drilling of the sphenoid rostrum with a diamond burr (8, <1 mm, 12 cm), and drilling of the frontal beak with a cutting burr (5, <1 mm, 9 cm); however, the use of concurrent suction while drilling resulted in no droplets or splatter. The control condition of external activation of the drill resulted in gross contamination (11, 2 cm, 13 cm). Conclusion Our results indicate that there is very little droplet generation from routine rhinologic procedures. The droplet generation from drilling was mitigated with the use of concurrent suction. Extreme caution should be used to avoid activating powered instrumentation outside of the nasal cavity, which was found to cause droplet contamination.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationSharma, D., Rubel, K. E., Ye, M. J., Shipchandler, T. Z., Wu, A. W., Higgins, T. S., Burgin, S. J., Ting, J. Y., & Illing, E. A. (2020). Cadaveric Simulation of Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures: Analysis of Droplet Splatter Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820929274en_US
dc.identifier.issn0194-5998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23138
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0194599820929274en_US
dc.relation.journalOtolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0*
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectNasal Endoscopyen_US
dc.subjectSinus Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectDropleten_US
dc.subjectSplatteren_US
dc.titleCadaveric Simulation of Endoscopic Endonasal Procedures: Analysis of Droplet Splatter Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemicen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharma2020Cadaveric Simulation.pdf
Size:
1.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: