Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class
dc.contributor.author | McClelland, Shearwood, III | |
dc.contributor.author | Murphy, Blair | |
dc.contributor.author | Jaboin, Jerry J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zellars, Richard C. | |
dc.contributor.department | Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-18T12:26:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-18T12:26:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The increasing proportion of women in medicine has not been adequately reflected in the gender distribution of radiation oncology residents. The presence of at least one pre-residency peer-reviewed publication (PRP) has been associated with radiation oncology resident choice of academic over private practice career, with no significant gender difference in the likelihood of having a PRP (McClelland et al., 2017). We sought to pursue a gender-based analysis of PRP productivity in a current junior resident class. Methods: A list of radiation oncology residents from the graduating class of 2022 (PGY-2 academic year of 2018-2019) was obtained through internet investigation. Research productivity was calculated using PRP number, defined as the number of a resident's publications listed in PubMed (pubmed.gov) through the calendar year of residency application (2016 for this class). Results: Of 195 residents examined from the 2022 class, 61 (31%) were women, representing a nine percent increase from the resident class of 2016. Four-fifths of women had 1+ PRP, 31% had dual degrees, and 18% had a PhD. These percentages were comparable to their male counterparts, 73% with 1+ PRP, 28% with dual degrees, and 15% with a PhD. There were no statistically significant differences by gender in any of these benchmarks. Conclusions: While slower than the overall trend of increased female representation in medicine, the proportion of women in radiation oncology residency has increased by 0.9-1.5% annually over a recent six-year span. There remain no significant differences in PRP productivity, dual degree status, or PhD status by gender. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | McClelland S 3rd, Murphy B, Jaboin JJ, Zellars RC. Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class. Chin Clin Oncol. 2021;10(5):52. doi:10.21037/cco-21-95 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/42303 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | AME | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.21037/cco-21-95 | |
dc.relation.journal | Chinese Clinical Oncology | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.source | Publisher | |
dc.subject | Gender equity | |
dc.subject | Pre-residency peer-reviewed publications (PRP) | |
dc.subject | Radiation oncology residents; research productivity | |
dc.title | Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class | |
dc.type | Article |