Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design

dc.contributor.authorAhonen, Emily Q.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Dennis P.
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Erin L.
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Alan
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T18:06:58Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T18:06:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-31
dc.description.abstractBackground Detailed descriptions of implementation strategies are lacking, and there is a corresponding dearth of information regarding methods employed in implementation strategy development. This paper describes methods and findings related to the alpha testing of eLearning modules developed as part of the Housing First Technical Assistance and Training (HFTAT) program’s development. Alpha testing is an approach for improving the quality of a product prior to beta (i.e., real world) testing with potential applications for intervention development. Methods Ten participants in two cities tested the modules. We collected data through (1) a structured log where participants were asked to record their experiences as they worked through the modules; (2) a brief online questionnaire delivered at the end of each module; and (3) focus groups. Results The alpha test provided useful data related to the acceptability and feasibility of eLearning as an implementation strategy, as well as identifying a number of technical issues and bugs. Each of the qualitative methods used provided unique and valuable information. In particular, logs were the most useful for identifying technical issues, and focus groups provided high quality data regarding how the intervention could best be used as an implementation strategy. Conclusions Alpha testing was a valuable step in intervention development, providing us an understanding of issues that would have been more difficult to address at a later stage of the study. As a result, we were able to improve the modules prior to pilot testing of the entire HFTAT. Researchers wishing to alpha test interventions prior to piloting should balance the unique benefits of different data collection approaches with the need to minimize burdens for themselves and participants. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0187-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationAhonen, E. Q., Watson, D. P., Adams, E. L., & McGuire, A. (2017). Alpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention design. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0187-yen_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/16145
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s40814-017-0187-yen_US
dc.relation.journalPilot and Feasibility Studiesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAlpha testen_US
dc.subjectCommunity of practiceen_US
dc.subjectDigital badgingen_US
dc.subjectHousing Firsten_US
dc.subjectImplementation strategyen_US
dc.subjectIntervention developmenten_US
dc.subjectNarrative storytellingen_US
dc.subjecteLearningen_US
dc.titleAlpha test results for a Housing First eLearning strategy: the value of multiple qualitative methods for intervention designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
40814_2017_Article_187.pdf
Size:
2.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: