Complications and Outcomes Associated with Two-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorZiemba-Davis, Mary
dc.contributor.authorBuller, Leonard T.
dc.contributor.authorMeneghini, R. Michael
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T19:47:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-16T19:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-19
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been traditionally treated with two-stage revision. However, single-stage treatment is gaining popularity based on claims of decreased morbidity and mortality. This study sought to evaluate whether two-stage treatment for chronic knee PJI is associated with high morbidity and complication rates compared to existing literature. Methods: Prospectively collected data on all two-stage knee revisions were retrospectively reviewed (n=97). Modern perioperative optimization protocols were implemented during the interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Surgical complications were quantified for interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Chi-squared tests compared current findings to published data. Results: Patient sex and age were equivalent, with more current smokers in the present study (P=.001) and more renal failure (P=.002) in the comparison study. Infection complexity in the current study is indicated by 84% late chronic infections in compromised (McPherson) hosts (70%) with 14% polymicrobial infections (unknown for comparison). One percent of cases in the current study did not undergo component reimplantation compared to 8.2% in the comparison study (P=.015). There were no differences in interstage and post-reimplantation septic surgeries (P=.566). Within a year of reimplantation, 9% versus 29% underwent septic reoperation (P=.0002). Using a proposed system from the comparison study penalizing additional operations required to eradicate infection, treatment success rates at minimum one-year follow-up were 56% (current study) and 51% (comparison study) (P=.412). Without these penalties, treatment success in the current study was 64% (unknown for comparison). All-cause mortality rates were the same in both samples (13.4%); however, 9/13 deaths in the current study were unrelated to PJI (unknown for comparison). No patients in the current sample died within the first postoperative year compared to 6.7% in the comparison (P=.024). Conclusion: Study data suggest morbidity attributed to two-stage treatment for PJI reflects the inherent complexity of this patient group, and not the two-stage treatment itself.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43331
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectOrthopedic Surgery
dc.subjectOrthopaedic Surgery
dc.subjectTotal Knee Infection
dc.subjectTwo-stage
dc.subjectTotal Knee Arthroplasty
dc.titleComplications and Outcomes Associated with Two-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection
dc.typePoster
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
WAC 2024 Complications PJI Knees.pdf
Size:
253.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: