An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening

dc.contributor.authorChampion, Victoria L.
dc.contributor.authorChristy, Shannon M.
dc.contributor.authorRakowski, William
dc.contributor.authorLairson, David R.
dc.contributor.authorMonahan, Patrick O.
dc.contributor.authorGathirua-Mwangi, Wambui G.
dc.contributor.authorStump, Timothy E.
dc.contributor.authorBiederman, Erika B.
dc.contributor.authorKettler, Carla D.
dc.contributor.authorRawl, Susan M.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-16T16:34:52Z
dc.date.available2022-02-16T16:34:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Adherence to breast and colorectal cancer screenings reduce mortality from these cancers, yet screening rates remain suboptimal. This 2 × 2 RCT compared 3 theory-based interventions to usual care to simultaneously increase breast and colon cancer screening in women who were nonadherent to both screenings at study entry. Design RCT. Setting/participants Women (n=692) who were nonadherent to both breast and colon cancer screenings and aged 51–75 years were recruited. Enrollment, intervention delivery, and data collection were completed between 2013 and 2017, and data analyzed in 2018. Intervention The randomized intervention included the following 4 groups: 3 intervention arms (personally tailored messages using a web-based intervention, phone delivery by a trained navigator, or both) compared with usual care. Women at an average risk for colon cancer were allowed to select either colonoscopy or stool test as their preferred colon cancer screening. Mammography was promoted for breast cancer screening. Main outcome measures Outcome data at 6 months included self-report and medical records for screening activity. Results All intervention arms significantly increased receipt of either a mammogram or stool test compared with control (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0001, web + phone: p<0.0001). When considering receipt of both mammogram and stool test, all intervention arms were significantly different from usual care (web: p<0.0249, phone: p<0.0003, web + phone: p<0.0001). In addition, women who were adherent to mammography had a 4.5 times greater odds of becoming adherent to colonoscopy. Conclusions The tailored intervention simultaneously supporting both breast and colon cancer screenings significantly improved rates of obtaining one of the screenings and increased receipt of both tests.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationChampion, V. L., Christy, S. M., Rakowski, W., Lairson, D. R., Monahan, P. O., Gathirua-Mwangi, W. G., Stump, T. E., Biederman, E. B., Kettler, C. D., & Rawl, S. M. (2020). An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), e69–e78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/27816
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.amepre.2020.03.008en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicineen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectbreast cancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectrandomized interventionen_US
dc.titleAn RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screeningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Champion_2020_RCT.pdf
Size:
602.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: