Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model

dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, J.
dc.contributor.authorGromski, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorSaito, K.
dc.contributor.authorLoundou, A.
dc.contributor.authorMatthes, K.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-13T20:35:03Z
dc.date.available2017-06-13T20:35:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.description.abstractBackground: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is essential in the management of digestive cancers. However, teaching and learning this technique remain challenging due to the lack of cost-effective models. Material and methods: This was a prospective experimental study using a complete porcine upper gastrointestinal ex-vivo organ package, placed in an Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE-R), and prepared with one cyst and two solid masses (2 cm). Five fellows inexperienced in EUS-FNA were enrolled, performing 10 procedures on each lesion, alternatively. The total time, number of attempts for success, of needle view losses, and of scope handling were recorded, associated with an independent skills rating by procedure. We compared the first 15 procedures with the last 15 for each fellow. Results: The fellows successfully performed all procedures in 2 to 40 minutes, requiring 1 to 6 attempts. All (5/5) improved their total time taken (P < 0.001), number of times when the EUS view of the needle was lost (P < 0.05), scope handling (P < 0.005), and skills rating (P < 0.001), whereas 4/5 (80 %) improved their number of attempts. The overall evaluation showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the total time taken (11.2 ± 7.8 vs 4.3 ± 2.2 minutes), number of attempts (2.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.7), number of times when the EUS view of the needle was lost (2.3 ± 2 vs 0.5 ± 0.7), and need for scope handling (1.1 ± 1.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.2). We also observed an improvement in skills rating (5 ± 1.9 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1). Conclusion: This newly designed ex-vivo model seems to be an effective way to improve the initial learning of EUS-FNA, by performing 30 procedures.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGonzalez, J. M., Cohen, J., Gromski, M. A., Saito, K., Loundou, A., & Matthes, K. (2016). Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model. Endoscopy International Open, 4(12), E1286–E1291. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-118176en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/13005
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThiemeen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-0042-118176en_US
dc.relation.journalEndoscopy International Openen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)en_US
dc.subjectDigestive cancersen_US
dc.subjectLearningen_US
dc.titleLearning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10-1055-s-0042-118176.pdf
Size:
412.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Original article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: