Vocation Clustering for Heavy-Duty Vehicles

dc.contributor.advisorBen-Miled, Zina
dc.contributor.authorKobold, Daniel, Jr.
dc.contributor.otherKing, Brian S.
dc.contributor.otherDos Santos, Euzeli C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T15:07:08Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T15:07:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.degree.date2020en_US
dc.degree.disciplineElectrical & Computer Engineeringen
dc.degree.grantorPurdue Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.E.C.E.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe identification of the vocation of an unknown heavy-duty vehicle is valuable to parts manufacturers who may not have otherwise access to this information on a consistent basis. This study proposes a methodology for vocation identification that is based on clustering techniques. Two clustering algorithms are considered: K-Means and Expectation Maximization. These algorithms are used to first construct the operating profile of each vocation from a set of vehicles with known vocations. The vocation of an unknown vehicle is then determined using different assignment methods. These methods fall under two main categories: one-versus-all and one-versus-one. The one-versus-all approach compares an unknown vehicle to all potential vocations. The one-versus-one approach compares the unknown vehicle to two vocations at a time in a tournament fashion. Two types of tournaments are investigated: round-robin and bracket. The accuracy and efficiency of each of the methods is evaluated using the NREL FleetDNA dataset. The study revealed that some of the vocations may have unique operating profiles and are therefore easily distinguishable from others. Other vocations, however, can have confounding profiles. This indicates that different vocations may benefit from profiles with varying number of clusters. Determining the optimal number of clusters for each vocation can not only improve the assignment accuracy, but also enhance the computational efficiency of the application. The optimal number of clusters for each vocation is determined using both static and dynamic techniques. Static approaches refer to methods that are completed prior to training and may require multiple iterations. Dynamic techniques involve clusters being split or removed during training. The results show that the accuracy of dynamic techniques is comparable to that of static approaches while benefiting from a reduced computational time.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24785
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/2583
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectHeavy-Duty Vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectVocation Clusteringen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectExpectation-Maximizationen_US
dc.subjectK-Meansen_US
dc.subjectClusteringen_US
dc.subjectVocationen_US
dc.titleVocation Clustering for Heavy-Duty Vehiclesen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DKobold_Thesis_Final.pdf
Size:
603.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: