Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

dc.contributor.authorYeap, Yar Luan
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, John W.
dc.contributor.authorBackfish-White, Kevin M.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Jerry V.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorCeppa, Duykhanh P.
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Elizabeth A. S.
dc.contributor.authorBirdas, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T20:33:59Z
dc.date.available2021-12-28T20:33:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.description.abstractObjective Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has improved patient outcomes; however, postoperative pain remains potentially severe. The objective of this study was to compare adjunct analgesic modalities for VATS, including paravertebral nerve blockade (PVB) and thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). Design Prospective, randomized trial. Setting Large academic hospital, single institution. Participants Adult patients undergoing VATS. Interventions Ultrasound-guided PVB catheter, ultrasound-guided single-injection PVB, or TEA. Measurements and Main Results Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (at rest and with knee flexion) and opioid usage were recorded. Pain scores (with movement) for the TEA group were lower than those for either PVB group at 24 hours (p ≤ 0.008) and for the PVB catheter group at 48 hours (p = 0.002). Opioid use in TEA group was lower than that for either PVB group at 24 and 48 hours (p < 0.001) and 72 hours (p < 0.05). Single-injection PVB was faster compared with PVB catheter placement (6 min v 12 min; p < 0.001) but similar to TEA (5 min). Patient satisfaction, nausea, sedation, and 6-month postsurgical pain did not differ between groups. Conclusions TEA led to lower pain scores and opioid requirement for VATS procedures compared with PVB techniques. Single-injection PVB was faster and equally as effective as PVB catheter, and it led to similar patient satisfaction as TEA; therefore, it should be considered in patients who are not ideal candidates for TEA.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationYeap, Y. L., Wolfe, J. W., Backfish-White, K. M., Young, J. V., Stewart, J., Ceppa, D. P., Moser, E. A. S., & Birdas, T. J. (2020). Randomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 34(7), 1870–1876. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.036en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-0770en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/27198
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1053/j.jvca.2020.01.036en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiaen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectcatheteren_US
dc.subjectparavertebralen_US
dc.subjectregional analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectthoracoscopyen_US
dc.subjectVATSen_US
dc.titleRandomized Prospective Study Evaluating Single-Injection Paravertebral Block, Paravertebral Catheter, and Thoracic Epidural Catheter for Postoperative Regional Analgesia After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Luan-Yeap2020Randomized-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
314.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: