Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom

dc.contributor.authorWright, R. George
dc.contributor.departmentRobert H. McKinney School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T12:20:31Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T12:20:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-02
dc.description.abstractThis very brief paper addresses the important Free Exercise case of Tandon v. Newsom, with an emphasis on the initial strict scrutiny determination, and then on applying the strict scrutiny test in appropriate cases.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationWright, R. George, Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom (May 2, 2021). University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3838288 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3838288
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/46924
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.2139/ssrn.3838288
dc.relation.journalSSRN Electronic Journal
dc.rightsIU Indianapolis Open Access Policy
dc.sourceSSRN
dc.subjectReligion
dc.subjectFree exercise
dc.subjectStrict scrutiny
dc.subjectTandon
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.titleFree Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wright2021Free-PP.pdf
Size:
411.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: