Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom
dc.contributor.author | Wright, R. George | |
dc.contributor.department | Robert H. McKinney School of Law | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-09T12:20:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-09T12:20:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | This very brief paper addresses the important Free Exercise case of Tandon v. Newsom, with an emphasis on the initial strict scrutiny determination, and then on applying the strict scrutiny test in appropriate cases. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wright, R. George, Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom (May 2, 2021). University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3838288 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3838288 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/46924 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2139/ssrn.3838288 | |
dc.relation.journal | SSRN Electronic Journal | |
dc.rights | IU Indianapolis Open Access Policy | |
dc.source | SSRN | |
dc.subject | Religion | |
dc.subject | Free exercise | |
dc.subject | Strict scrutiny | |
dc.subject | Tandon | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.title | Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. Newsom | |
dc.type | Article |