Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2015
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Springer
Abstract

Introduction: Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data.

Methods: We designed a program that captures patients’ preferences for provider access to an urban health system’s EHR. Patients could allow or restrict providers’ access to all data (diagnoses, medications, test results, reports, etc.) or only highly sensitive data (sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, drugs/alcohol, mental or reproductive health). Except for information in free-text reports, we redacted EHR data shown to providers according to patients’ preferences. Providers could “Break the Glass” to display redacted information. We prospectively studied this system in one primary care clinic, noting redactions and when users “Broke the Glass,” and surveyed providers about their experiences and opinions.

Results: Eight of 9 eligible clinic physicians and all 23 clinic staff participated. All 105 patients who enrolled completed the preference program.. Providers did not know which of their patients were enrolled and nor their preferences for accessing their EHRs. During the six-month prospective study, 92 study patients (88%) returned 261 times during which providers viewed their EHRs 126 times (48%). Providers “broke the glass” 102 times, 92 times for patients not in the study and 10 times for 6 returning study patients, all of whom had restricted EHR access. Providers “broke the glass” for 6 (14%) of 43 returning study patients with redacted data vs. zero among 49 study patients without redactions (p=0.01). Although 54% of providers agreed that patients should have control over who sees their EHR information, 58% believed restricting EHR access could harm provider-patient relationships and 71% felt quality of care would suffer.

Conclusions: Patients frequently preferred restricting provider access to their EHRs. Providers infrequently overrode patients’ preferences to view hidden data. Providers believed restricting EHR access would adversely impact patient care. Applying Fair Information Practice principles to EHRs will require balancing patient preferences, providers’ needs, and health care quality.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Tierney, W. M., Alpert, S. A., Byrket, A., Caine, K., Leventhal, J. C., Meslin, E. M., & Schwartz, P. H. (2015). Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(1), 31–37. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3053-0
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
This study was supported in part by grant number 90HT005 from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) to the Indiana Health Information Technology Corporation. The opinions expressed in this work are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the positions of ONC, IHIT, Eskenazi Health, Indiana University, or the Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}