Discrepancy Between Stone and Tissue Mineral Type in Patients with Idiopathic Uric Acid Stones

dc.contributor.authorEvan, Andrew P.
dc.contributor.authorCoe, Fredric L.
dc.contributor.authorWorcester, Elaine M.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, James C., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorHeiman, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorBledsoe, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorPhilips, Carrie L.
dc.contributor.authorLingeman, James E.
dc.contributor.departmentAnatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T14:13:51Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T14:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To describe the papillary pathology found in uric acid (UA) stone formers, and to investigate the mineral form of tissue deposits. Materials and Methods: We studied eight UA stone formers treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Papillae were imaged intraoperatively using digital endoscopy, and cortical and papillary biopsies were taken. Biopsies were analyzed by light microscopy, micro-CT, and microinfrared spectroscopy. Results: As expected, urine pH was generally low. UA supersaturation exceeded one in all but one case, compatible with the stone material. By intraoperative imaging, the renal papillae displayed a heterogeneous mixture of plaque and plugging, ranging from normal to severe. All patients had mineral in ducts of Bellini and inner medullary collecting ducts, mainly apatite with lesser amounts of urate and/or calcium oxalate in some specimens. Papillary and cortical interstitial tissue injury was modest despite the tubule plugging. No instance was found of a stone growing attached to either plaque or plugs. Conclusions: UA stone formers resemble those with ileostomy in having rather low urine pH while forming tubule plugs that contain crystals that can only form at pH values above those of their bulk urine. This discrepancy between tissue mineral deposits and stone type suggests that local tubular pH exceeds that of the bulk urine, perhaps because of localized tubule injury. The manner in which UA stones form and the discordance between tubule crystals and stone type remain open research questions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationEvan, A. P., Coe, F. L., Worcester, E. M., Williams, J. C., Heiman, J., Bledsoe, S., ... & Lingeman, J. E. (2020). Discrepancy Between Stone and Tissue Mineral Type in Patients with Idiopathic Uric Acid Stones. Journal of Endourology, 34(3), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22629
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLieberten_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1089/end.2019.0564en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectnephrolithiasisen_US
dc.subjecturic aciden_US
dc.subjectRandall’s plaqueen_US
dc.titleDiscrepancy Between Stone and Tissue Mineral Type in Patients with Idiopathic Uric Acid Stonesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evan_2020_discrepancy.pdf
Size:
621.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: