Implementation context for addressing social needs in a learning health system: a qualitative study

dc.contributor.authorTheis, Ryan P.
dc.contributor.authorBlackburn, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorLipori, Gloria
dc.contributor.authorHarle, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.authorAlvarado, Michelle M.
dc.contributor.authorCarek, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorZemon, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Angela
dc.contributor.authorSalloum, Ramzi G.
dc.contributor.authorShenkman, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorUF CTSI Learning Health System Program
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T18:12:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-28T18:12:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-31
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Unmet social needs contribute to growing health disparities and rising health care costs. Strategies to collect and integrate information on social needs into patients' electronic health records (EHRs) show promise for connecting patients with community resources. However, gaps remain in understanding the contextual factors that impact implementing these interventions in clinical settings. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and focus groups with providers (January-September 2020) in two primary care clinics to inform the implementation of a module that collects and integrates patient-reported social needs information into the EHR. Questions addressed constructs within the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data were coded deductively using team-based framework analysis, followed by inductive coding and matrix analyses. Results: Forty patients participated in interviews, with 20 recruited at the clinics and 20 from home. Two focus groups were conducted with a total of 12 providers. Factors salient to acceptability and feasibility included patients' discomfort answering sensitive questions, concerns about privacy, difficulty reading/understanding module content, and technological literacy. Rapport with providers was a facilitator for patients to discuss social needs. Providers stressed that limited time with patients would be a barrier, and expressed concerns about the lack of available community resources. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need for flexible approaches to assessing and discussing social needs with patients. Feasibility of the intervention is contingent upon support from the health system to facilitate social needs assessment and discussion. Further study of availability of community resources is needed to ensure intervention effectiveness.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationTheis RP, Blackburn K, Lipori G, et al. Implementation context for addressing social needs in a learning health system: a qualitative study. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021;5(1):e201. Published 2021 Aug 31. doi:10.1017/cts.2021.842
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/45547
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1017/cts.2021.842
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical and Translational Science
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectSocial determinants of health
dc.subjectElectronic health records
dc.subjectImplementation science
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.titleImplementation context for addressing social needs in a learning health system: a qualitative study
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Theis2021Implementation-CCBY.pdf
Size:
296.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: