Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective, randomized study

dc.contributor.authorGromski, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorSieber, Marnie S.
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorRex, Douglas K.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-02T20:31:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-02T20:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims The potential for transmission of pathogenic organisms is a problem inherent to the current reusable duodenoscope design. Recent outbreaks of multidrug resistant pathogenic organisms transmitted via duodenoscopes has brought to light the urgency of this problem. Microbiological culturing of duodenoscopes and reprocessing with repeat high-level disinfection or liquid chemical sterilization have been offered as supplemental measures to enhance duodenoscope reprocessing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study aims to compare the efficacy of reprocessing duodenoscopes with double high-level disinfection (DHLD) versus liquid chemical sterilization (LCS). Methods We prospectively evaluated 2 different modalities of duodenoscope reprocessing from October 23, 2017 to September 24, 2018. Eligible duodenoscopes were randomly segregated to be reprocessed by either DHLD or LCS. Duodenoscopes were randomly cultured after reprocessing for surveillance based on an internal protocol. Results During the study time period, there were 878 postreprocessing surveillance cultures (453 in the DHLD group and 425 in the LCS group). Of all of the cultures, 17 were positive for any organism (1.9%). There was no significant difference of positive cultures when comparing the duodenoscopes undergoing DHLD (8 positive cultures, 1.8%) to duodenoscopes undergoing LCS (9 positive cultures, 2.1%, p=0.8). Both groups had 2 cultures that grew high-concern organisms (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p=1.0). No multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO), including carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE), were detected. Conclusions DHLD and LCS both resulted in a low rate of positive cultures, both for all organisms and for high-concern organisms, but neither process completely eliminated positive cultures from duodenoscopes reprocessed with 2 different supplemental reprocessing strategies.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationGromski, M. A., Sieber, M. S., Sherman, S., & Rex, D. K. (2020). Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: A prospective, randomized study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.057en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23977
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.057en_US
dc.relation.journalGastrointestinal Endoscopyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyen_US
dc.subjectliquid chemical sterilizationen_US
dc.subjectdouble high-level disinfectionen_US
dc.titleDouble high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective, randomized studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gromski_2020_double.pdf
Size:
126.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: