Genetic Data Aren't So Special: Causes and Implications of Reidentification

Date
2020-10-23
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wiley
Abstract

Genetic information is widely thought to pose unique risks of reidentifying individuals. Genetic data reveals a great deal about who we are and, the standard view holds, should consequently be treated differently from other types of data. Contrary to this view, we argue that the dangers of reidentification for genetic and nongenetic data—including health, financial, and consumer information—are more similar than has been recognized. Before different requirements are imposed around sharing genetic information, proponents of the standard view must show that they are in fact necessary. We further argue that the similarities between genetic and nongenetic information have important implications for communicating risks during consent for health care and research. While patients and research participants need to be more aware of pervasive data-sharing practices, consent forms are the wrong place to provide this education. Instead, health systems should engage with patients throughout patient care to educate them about data-sharing practices.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Kasperbauer, T. J., & Schwartz, P. H. (2020). Genetic Data Aren’t So Special: Causes and Implications of Reidentification. Hastings Center Report, 50(5), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1183
ISSN
1552-146X
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Hastings Center Report
Rights
IUPUI Open Access Policy
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}