Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.contributor.author | Newson, Martha | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Yi | |
dc.contributor.author | Zein, Marwa El | |
dc.contributor.author | Sulik, Justin | |
dc.contributor.author | Dezecache, Guillaume | |
dc.contributor.author | Deroy, Ophelia | |
dc.contributor.author | Tunçgenç, Bahar | |
dc.contributor.department | Biostatistics, School of Public Health | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-20T22:07:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-20T22:07:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | With restricted face-to-face interactions, COVID-19 lockdowns and distancing measures tested the capability of computer-mediated communication to foster social contact and wellbeing. In a multinational sample (n = 6436), we investigated how different modes of contact related to wellbeing during the pandemic. Computer-mediated communication was more common than face-to-face, and its use was influenced by COVID-19 death rates, more so than state stringency measures. Despite its legal and health threats, face-to-face contact was still positively associated with wellbeing, and messaging apps had a negative association. Perceived household vulnerability to COVID-19 reduced the positive effect of face-to-face communication on wellbeing, but surprisingly, people’s own vulnerability did not. Computer-mediated communication was particularly negatively associated with the wellbeing of young and empathetic people. Findings show people endeavored to remain socially connected, yet however, maintain a physical distance, despite the tangible costs to their wellbeing. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Newson, M., Zhao, Y., Zein, M. E., Sulik, J., Dezecache, G., Deroy, O., & Tunçgenç, B. (2021). Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society, 14614448211062164. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211062164 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1461-4448, 1461-7315 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/31001 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sage | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1177/14614448211062164 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | New Media & Society | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | * |
dc.source | Publisher | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer-mediated communication | en_US |
dc.subject | COVID-19 pandemic | en_US |
dc.subject | empathy | en_US |
dc.subject | gender | en_US |
dc.title | Digital contact does not promote wellbeing, but face-to-face contact does: A cross-national survey during the COVID-19 pandemic | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |