Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists
dc.contributor.author | Bartlett Ellis, Rebecca | |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, Julie | |
dc.contributor.author | Soederberg Miller, Lisa | |
dc.contributor.author | Jake-Schoffman, Danielle | |
dc.contributor.author | Hekler, Eric B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goldstein, Carly M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arigo, Danielle | |
dc.contributor.author | Nebeker, Camille | |
dc.contributor.department | School of Nursing | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-29T09:09:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-29T09:09:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | Digital technologies offer unique opportunities for health research. For example, Twitter posts can support public health surveillance to identify outbreaks (eg, influenza and COVID-19), and a wearable fitness tracker can provide real-time data collection to assess the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention. With these opportunities, it is necessary to consider the potential risks and benefits to research participants when using digital tools or strategies. Researchers need to be involved in the risk assessment process, as many tools in the marketplace (eg, wellness apps, fitness sensors) are underregulated. However, there is little guidance to assist researchers and institutional review boards in their evaluation of digital tools for research purposes. To address this gap, the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers (DHC-R) was developed as a decision support tool. A participatory research approach involving a group of behavioral scientists was used to inform DHC-R development. Scientists beta-tested the checklist by retrospectively evaluating the technologies they had chosen for use in their research. This paper describes the lessons learned because of their involvement in the beta-testing process and concludes with recommendations for how the DHC-R could be useful for a variety of digital health stakeholders. Recommendations focus on future research and policy development to support research ethics, including the development of best practices to advance safe and responsible digital health research. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bartlett Ellis R, Wright J, Soederberg Miller L, et al. Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e25414. Published 2021 Dec 22. doi:10.2196/25414 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/40301 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | JMIR | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2196/25414 | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Medical Internet Research | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Access | |
dc.subject | Behavioral medicine | |
dc.subject | Bioethics | |
dc.subject | Data management | |
dc.subject | Digital health | |
dc.subject | Institutional review board | |
dc.subject | mHealth | |
dc.subject | Mobile phone | |
dc.subject | Privacy | |
dc.subject | Research ethics | |
dc.subject | Risks and benefits | |
dc.subject | Social media | |
dc.subject | Usability | |
dc.subject | Wearable sensors | |
dc.title | Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists | |
dc.type | Article |