Meaningful differences in patient-reported outcome measurement scores in liver disease

Date
2025-05-29
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Wolters Kluwer
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used more often in chronic liver disease (CLD) clinical care and research. Their interpretability can be greatly enhanced by establishing the smallest meaningful score difference (MSD). We report scores of commonly used PROMs and their MSDs in patients at different stages of liver disease.

Methods: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Profile, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) v1.0 scores were aggregated from 2442 adults with CLD at 4 different stages: inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis (n=1146) and outpatients with cirrhosis (n=677) or CLD (n=128) or recipients of liver transplant (LT, n=490) between June 2014 and April 2023 from 3 academic centers. MSDs were estimated using distribution and anchor-based methods.

Results: The study sample's median age was 60.0 (IQR: 51.0-66.0); 55% were male, 17% Hispanic, 84% White, and 49% college educated. The etiology of CLD was alcohol in 36%, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in 31%, and viral hepatitis B/C in 26%. Median PROMIS domain scores were generally lowest in inpatients and highest after transplant. For PROMIS, distribution-based and anchor-based MSDs ranged from 3 to 4 for individual domains and 4 to 6 for summary scores. Distribution-based MSDs were 1 for CLDQ and ranged from 7 to 11 for individual SF-36 domains, except role limitations domains, which ranged from 15 to 18, and component scores, which were 3. When compared across stages of liver disease, PROMIS MSDs were generally similar, although they tended to be 0.5-1.0 points smaller in the decompensated population compared to the stable populations.

Conclusions: This study provides data-driven recommendations for MSDs, enhancing the interpretability of commonly used PROMs in liver disease and facilitating the integration of PROMs in various clinical and research settings.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Desai AP, Orman ES, Aridi TG, et al. Meaningful differences in patient-reported outcome measurement scores in liver disease. Hepatol Commun. 2025;9(6):e0727. Published 2025 May 29. doi:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000727
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Hepatology Communications
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}