Determining the Minimally Clinically Important Difference for the Disability Rating Scale in Persons With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

dc.contributor.authorHammond, Flora M.
dc.contributor.authorKetchum, Jessica M.
dc.contributor.authorPatni, Vipul Vinod
dc.contributor.authorNejadnik, Bijan
dc.contributor.authorBates, Damien
dc.contributor.authorWeintraub, Alan H.
dc.contributor.departmentPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T19:57:59Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T19:57:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-04
dc.description.abstractThe Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) is accepted as the primary outcome measure in registrational studies for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Disability Rating Scale (DRS) is used to assess functional progress from initial acute injury, through rehabilitation and reintegration into the community and life. For these reasons, the DRS is an alternative measure for assessing meaningful global outcomes in chronic TBI. The objective of this study was to determine the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the DRS in chronic TBI, by determining the magnitude of DRS change associated with the MCID for the GOSE of 1 point. This study is a retrospective analysis of the multi-center, prospective, longitudinal, Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database of persons with outcomes at 1, 2, and 5 years and every 5 years thereafter post-injury. Spearman's correlations for dynamic and static relationships between the DRS and GOSE were significant. For the 1-point MCID for the GOSE, the dynamic MCID estimate for the DRS of a −0.68-point change was calculated as the mean DRS change associated with the difference of the GOSE score between year 1 and year 2 (score range, 3–8), using all persons in the study (n = 11,102), whereas the exploratory static MCID estimate for the DRS of −1.28 points was calculated from the slope of the best-fit line between the DRS and GOSE at year 1 follow-up (score range, 3–8; n = 13,415). The final MCID for the DRS was calculated by using the triangulation method (i.e., the arithmetic mean of the dynamic and exploratory static MCID estimates), which resulted in a −1.0-point change. The significant correlation between the DRS and GOSE has allowed for the establishment of a −1.0-point MCID for the DRS, which supports the use of the DRS as an alternative primary outcome measure for chronic TBI research studies, including clinical trials.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationHammond FM, Ketchum JM, Patni VV, Nejadnik B, Bates D, Weintraub AH. Determining the Minimally Clinically Important Difference for the Disability Rating Scale in Persons With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotrauma Rep. 2023;4(1):447-457. Published 2023 Jul 4. doi:10.1089/neur.2023.0038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/38460
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert
dc.relation.isversionof10.1089/neur.2023.0038
dc.relation.journalNeurotrauma Reports
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectDisability Rating Scale
dc.subjectExtended Glasgow Outcome Scale
dc.subjectMinimally clinically important difference
dc.subjectSpearman's correlations
dc.subjectTraumatic brain injury
dc.titleDetermining the Minimally Clinically Important Difference for the Disability Rating Scale in Persons With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
neur.2023.0038.pdf
Size:
33.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: