Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials

dc.contributor.authorLabban, Nawaf
dc.contributor.authorAlSheikh, Rasha
dc.contributor.authorLund, Melvin
dc.contributor.authorMatis, Bruce A.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, B. Keith
dc.contributor.authorCochran, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorPlatt, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.departmentCariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T18:10:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-09T18:10:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-25
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 - W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 - W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey's multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLabban N, AlSheikh R, Lund M, et al. Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(17):2851. Published 2021 Aug 25. doi:10.3390/polym13172851en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/31778
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/polym13172851en_US
dc.relation.journalPolymersen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectLuting agentsen_US
dc.subjectPolymeric cementsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectWater solubilityen_US
dc.subjectWater sorptionen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
polymers-13-02851.pdf
Size:
403.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: