The use of dithiothreitol for the quantitative analysis of elemental sulfur concentrations and isotopes in environmental samples

dc.contributor.authorKurek, Martin R.
dc.contributor.authorGilhooly, William P., III
dc.contributor.authorDruschel, Gregory K.
dc.contributor.authorO'Beirne, Molly D.
dc.contributor.authorWerne, Josef P.
dc.contributor.departmentEarth Science, School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-15T18:10:51Z
dc.date.available2018-02-15T18:10:51Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractDetermining the concentration and isotopic composition of elemental sulfur in modern and ancient environments is essential to improved interpretation of the mechanisms and pathways of sulfur utilization in biogeochemical cycles. Elemental sulfur can be extracted from sediment or water samples and quantified by converting to hydrogen sulfide. Alternatively, elemental sulfur concentrations can themselves be analyzed using HPLC and other methodologies; however, the preparation and analysis times can be long and these methods are not amenable to stable isotopic analysis. Current reduction methods involve the use of costly and specialized glassware in addition to toxins such as chromium chloride or cyanide to reduce the sulfur to hydrogen sulfide. The novel reduction method presented here uses dithiothreitol (DTT) as a less toxic reducing agent to obtain both elemental sulfur concentrations and isotopic composition from the same sample. The sample is dissolved in an aqueous or organic liquid medium and upon reaction with DTT, the elemental sulfur is volatilized as hydrogen sulfide and collected in a sulfide trap using an inexpensive gas extraction apparatus. The evolved sulfide concentrations can easily be measured for concentration, by absorbance spectrophotometery or voltammetry techniques, and then analyzed for sulfur isotopic composition. The procedure is quantitative at >93% recovery to dissolved elemental sulfur with no observed sulfur isotope fractionation during reduction and recovery. Controlled experiments also demonstrate that DTT is not reactive to sulfate, sulfite, pyrite, or organic sulfur.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationKurek, M. R., Gilhooly III, W. P., Druschel, G. K., O’Beirne, M. D., & Werne, J. P. (2018). The use of dithiothreitol for the quantitative analysis of elemental sulfur concentrations and isotopes in environmental samples. Chemical Geology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15214
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.014en_US
dc.relation.journalChemical Geologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectelemental sulfuren_US
dc.subjectdithiothreitolen_US
dc.subjectDTTen_US
dc.titleThe use of dithiothreitol for the quantitative analysis of elemental sulfur concentrations and isotopes in environmental samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kurek_2018_use.pdf
Size:
2.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: