The Validity and Timing of the ABR Core Exam

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2016-09
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract

The American Board of Radiology's (ABR) new Core Exam is not working, at least not as well as it needs to. Having helped to prepare candidates (RG), studied for and taken the exam (WK), and talked with hundreds of candidates who have taken the exam (RG and WK), we believe that that one aspect of the exam, its validity, can be significantly enhanced.

Just as we expect candidates for board certification and practicing radiologists to measure up to the high standards, so we should subject the board exam to continuous scrutiny, seeking opportunities to rectify errors and enhance the exam's overall quality, with a view to better promoting excellence in radiology practice and the care of patients. Here we focus on two exam parameters: validity and timing.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Kerridge, W. D., & Gunderman, R. B. (2016). The Validity and Timing of the ABR Core Exam. Academic Radiology, 23(9), 1176–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.05.004
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Academic Radiology
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}