Development and use of an instrument adapted to assess the clinical skills learning environment in the pre-clinical years
dc.contributor.author | Rdesinski, Rebecca E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chappelle, Kathryn G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elliot, Diane L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Litzelman, Debra K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Ryan | |
dc.contributor.author | Biagioli, Frances E. | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-16T15:58:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-16T15:58:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C3) instrument is a well-established survey for measuring the professional learning climate or hidden curriculum in the clinical years of medical school. However, few instruments exist for assessing professionalism in the pre-clinical years. We adapted the C3 instrument and assessed its utility during the pre-clinical years at two U.S. medical schools. METHODS: The ten-item Pre-Clinical C3 survey was adapted from the C3 instrument. Surveys were administered at the conclusion of the first and second years of medical school using a repeated cross-sectional design. Factor analysis was performed and Cronbach's alphas were calculated for emerging dimensions. RESULTS: The authors collected 458 and 564 surveys at two medical schools during AY06-07 and AY07-09 years, respectively. Factor analysis of the survey data revealed nine items in three dimensions: "Patients as Objects", "Talking Respectfully of Colleagues", and "Patient-Centered Behaviors". Reliability measures (Cronbach's alpha) for the Pre-Clinical C3 survey data were similar to those of the C3 survey for comparable dimensions for each school. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in all three dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The Pre-Clinical C3 instrument's performance was similar to the C3 instrument in measuring dimensions of professionalism. As medical education moves toward earlier and more frequent clinical and inter-professional educational experiences, the Pre-Clinical C3 instrument may be especially useful in evaluating the impact of curricular revisions. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rdesinski, R. E., Chappelle, K. G., Elliot, D. L., Litzelman, D. K., Palmer, R., & Biagioli, F. E. (2015). Development and use of an instrument adapted to assess the clinical skills learning environment in the pre-clinical years. Medical Science Educator, 25(3), 285–291. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0141-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/12542 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1007/s40670-015-0141-7 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Medical Science Educator | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient-Centered Care | en_US |
dc.subject | Preclinical curriculum | en_US |
dc.subject | Professionalism | en_US |
dc.title | Development and use of an instrument adapted to assess the clinical skills learning environment in the pre-clinical years | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |