Admission Factor V Predicts Transplant-Free Survival in Acute Liver Failure

dc.contributor.authorPatidar, Kavish R.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Brian C.
dc.contributor.authorSlaven, James E.
dc.contributor.authorGhabril, Marwan S.
dc.contributor.authorKubal, Chandrashekhar A.
dc.contributor.authorLee, William M.
dc.contributor.authorStravitz, Richard T.
dc.contributor.departmentBiostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T12:23:42Z
dc.date.available2024-04-12T12:23:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: Traditional laboratory markers are insensitive in distinguishing between patients with acute liver failure (ALF) who will require urgent liver transplantation (LT) from those who will recover spontaneously, particularly within 24 h of presentation. Coagulation factor-V (FV) may improve the accuracy of outcome prediction in ALF due to its predominant synthesis in the liver and short half-life in plasma. Methods: Patients enrolled in the ALF Study Group Registry from a single site had FV determined within 24 h of presentation (Derivation-Cohort). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) dichotomized by ALF etiology [acetaminophen (APAP) or non-APAP] were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FV for transplant-free-survival (TFS). Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed using FV and other clinical variables to predict TFS. Accuracy of FV and multivariable model were performed in a Validation-Cohort from a different site. Results: 90-patients (56% with APAP) were included in the Derivation-Cohort. Median FV was significantly higher in TFS versus those who died/LT (31% vs. 15%, respectively; p = 0.001). When dichotomized by etiology, AUROC for FV was 0.77 for APAP (cutoff, sensitivity, specificity 10.5%, 79%, 69%, respectively) and 0.77 for non-APAP (22%, 85%, 67%, respectively). When the optimal cutoffs for FV in the Derivation-Cohort were applied to the Validation-Cohort (N = 51; 59% with APAP), AUROC for FV was 0.75 for APAP (sensitivity/specificity 81/44) and 0.95 for non-APAP (sensitivity/specificity 90/73). In multivariate analyses, AUROC for FV model was 0.86 in the Derivation-Cohort and 0.90 in the Validation-Cohort. Conclusion: Admission FV may improve selection of patients who are likely to improve without LT.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationPatidar KR, Davis BC, Slaven JE, et al. Admission Factor V Predicts Transplant-Free Survival in Acute Liver Failure. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(2):619-627. doi:10.1007/s10620-020-06197-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39950
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10620-020-06197-3
dc.relation.journalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectAcetaminophen overdose
dc.subjectLiver transplantation
dc.subjectFulminant liver failure
dc.subjectIntensive care unit
dc.titleAdmission Factor V Predicts Transplant-Free Survival in Acute Liver Failure
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1943487.pdf
Size:
314.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: