Preliminary Validation of the Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised (CAMS-R) in Cancer Populations
dc.contributor.author | Snyder, Stella | |
dc.contributor.author | Secinti, Ekin | |
dc.contributor.author | Chinh, Kelly | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Wei | |
dc.contributor.author | Johns, Shelley A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mosher, Catherine E. | |
dc.contributor.department | Psychology, School of Science | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-17T13:22:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-17T13:22:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: A brief, valid, and comprehensive measure of mindfulness is needed for cancer populations. This study examined the factor structure, internal consistency, construct validity, and measurement invariance of the 10-item Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in patients with cancer. Methods: Patients with breast, gastrointestinal, lung, or prostate cancer (N = 404, 50% stage IV cancer, 51% women) were recruited from academic and public clinics in Indianapolis, IN. Patients completed the CAMS-R and other psychological measures at one time point. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the dimensionality of the CAMS-R. Internal consistency and construct validity were also assessed. Measurement invariance was examined for gender, cancer type, and cancer stage. Results: CFA showed that the original CAMS-R structure with four first-order factors (attention, present focus, awareness, and acceptance) and one second-order factor (mindfulness) had a reasonable fit (RMSEA = 0.09, CFI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.04). Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.90). The CAMS-R total score showed significant positive associations with several subscales of a widely used mindfulness questionnaire and self-compassion (rs = 0.61-0.66) and significant negative associations with anxiety, depressive symptoms, rumination, psychological inflexibility, and avoidant coping (rs = -0.35-0.58). Measurement invariance testing indicated that the CAMS-R was invariant across populations of varying genders, cancer types, and stages. Conclusions: Findings provide preliminary support for using the CAMS-R in cancer populations. Future research should assess the responsiveness of the CAMS-R to intervention. | |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | |
dc.identifier.citation | Snyder S, Secinti E, Chinh K, Wu W, Johns SA, Mosher CE. Preliminary validation of the Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised in cancer populations. Psychooncology. 2024;33(1):e6260. doi:10.1002/pon.6260 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/45724 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1002/pon.6260 | |
dc.relation.journal | Psycho-Oncology | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Cancer | |
dc.subject | Invariance testing | |
dc.subject | Measurement | |
dc.subject | Mindfulness | |
dc.subject | Oncology | |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
dc.title | Preliminary Validation of the Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised (CAMS-R) in Cancer Populations | |
dc.type | Article |