Mixed Methods Analysis of Caregiver Satisfaction With the Early Autism Evaluation Hub System

Date
2024-12-12
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Sage
Abstract

Community-based methods for autism evaluation may be one solution for ameliorating delays in diagnosis, which are exacerbated for children from minoritized backgrounds. However, limited research has examined caregiver satisfaction with community-based models of autism evaluation. Thus, our objective was to use a mixed-methods approach to investigate caregiver satisfaction with their child's autism evaluation conducted across a statewide system of primary care autism diagnosis. Results indicated overall high satisfaction and no significant differences were found between satisfaction total scores nor caregiver stress and any child/family demographic variables. Satisfaction and stress were also not related to autism diagnostic outcome, clinician diagnostic certainty, or diagnostic accuracy. Qualitative suggestions for evaluation improvement include more thorough explanation of diagnosis and service recommendations. Overall, our findings indicate high caregiver satisfaction with multiple dimensions of community-based autism evaluation in the primary care setting, suggesting this may be a feasible and sustainable model that caregivers find acceptable.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Martin AM, Huskins J, Paxton A, et al. Mixed Methods Analysis of Caregiver Satisfaction With the Early Autism Evaluation Hub System. J Patient Exp. 2024;11:23743735241305531. Published 2024 Dec 12. doi:10.1177/23743735241305531
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Journal of Patient Experience
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}