Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs

dc.contributor.authorLoberger, Jeremy M.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Caitlin M.
dc.contributor.authorColleti, José, Jr.
dc.contributor.authorBorasino, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Sultaneh, Samer
dc.contributor.authorKhemani, Robinder G.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T12:15:01Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T12:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-27
dc.description.abstractObjectives: 1) Characterize the prevalence of ventilator liberation protocol use in international PICUs, 2) identify the most commonly used protocol elements, and 3) estimate an international extubation failure rate and use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support modes. Design: International cross-sectional study. Subjects: Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians. Setting: Electronic survey. Intervention: None. Measurements and main results: Responses represented 380 unique PICUs from 47 different countries. Protocols for Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) practice (50%) and endotracheal tube cuff management (55.8%) were the only protocols used by greater than or equal to 50% of PICUs. Among PICUs screening for SBT eligibility, physicians were most commonly screened (62.7%) with daily frequency (64.2%). Among those with an SBT practice protocol, SBTs were most commonly performed by respiratory therapists/physiotherapists (49.2%) and least commonly by nurses (4.9%). Postextubation respiratory support protocols were not prevalent (28.7%). International practice variation was significant for most practices surveyed. The estimated median international extubation failure was 5% (interquartile range, 2.3-10%). A majority of respondents self-reported use of planned high-flow nasal cannula in less than or equal to 50% (84.2%) and planned noninvasive ventilation in less than or equal to 20% of extubations (81.6%). Conclusions: Variability in international pediatric ventilation liberation practice is high, and prevalence of protocol implementation is generally low. There is a need to better understand elements that drive clinical outcomes and opportunity to work on standardizing pediatric ventilation liberation practices worldwide.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLoberger JM, Campbell CM, Colleti J Jr, Borasino S, Abu-Sultaneh S, Khemani RG. Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs. Crit Care Explor. 2022;4(6):e0710. Published 2022 May 27. doi:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000710en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33952
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/CCE.0000000000000710en_US
dc.relation.journalCritical Care Explorationsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectClinical pathwayen_US
dc.subjectExtubationen_US
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen_US
dc.subjectPediatric intensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectPediatricsen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory therapyen_US
dc.titleVentilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cc9-4-e0710.pdf
Size:
888.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: