Clinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231

dc.contributor.authorBayoumy, Sherif
dc.contributor.authorVerberk, Inge M.W.
dc.contributor.authorden Dulk, Ben
dc.contributor.authorHussainali, Zulaiga
dc.contributor.authorZwan, Marissa
dc.contributor.authorvan der Flier, Wiesje M.
dc.contributor.authorAshton, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorZetterberg, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorBlennow, Kaj
dc.contributor.authorVanbrabant, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorStoops, Erik
dc.contributor.authorVanmechelen, Eugeen
dc.contributor.authorDage, Jeffrey L.
dc.contributor.authorTeunissen, Charlotte E.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T17:02:39Z
dc.date.available2023-04-11T17:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Studies using different assays and technologies showed highly promising diagnostic value of plasma phosphorylated (P-)tau levels for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to compare six P-tau Simoa assays, including three P-tau181 (Eli Lilly, ADx, Quanterix), one P-tau217 (Eli Lilly), and two P-tau231 (ADx, Gothenburg). Methods: We studied the analytical (sensitivity, precision, parallelism, dilution linearity, and recovery) and clinical (40 AD dementia patients, age 66±8years, 50%F; 40 age- and sex-matched controls) performance of the assays. Results: All assays showed robust analytical performance, and particularly P-tau217 Eli Lilly; P-tau231 Gothenburg and all P-tau181 assays showed robust clinical performance to differentiate AD from controls, with AUCs 0.936-0.995 (P-tau231 ADx: AUC = 0.719). Results obtained with all P-tau181 assays, P-tau217 Eli Lilly assay, and P-tau231 Gothenburg assay strongly correlated (Spearman's rho > 0.86), while correlations with P-tau231 ADx results were moderate (rho < 0.65). Discussion: P-tau isoforms can be measured robustly by several novel high-sensitive Simoa assays.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationBayoumy S, Verberk IMW, den Dulk B, et al. Clinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):198. Published 2021 Dec 4. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00939-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32339
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s13195-021-00939-9en_US
dc.relation.journalAlzheimer's Research & Therapyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical validationen_US
dc.subjectBlood biomarkersen_US
dc.subjectClinical validationen_US
dc.subjectP-tau181en_US
dc.subjectP-tau217en_US
dc.subjectP-tau231en_US
dc.subjectPhosphorylated tau proteinsen_US
dc.subjectSimoaen_US
dc.subjectUltra-sensitive immunoassaysen_US
dc.titleClinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13195_2021_Article_939.pdf
Size:
1.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: