Sustainability evaluation of pipe asset management strategies

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2016
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract

The consequences associated with pipe failures can be widespread impacting service, while potentially causing damage, affecting traffic, and contaminating water. Recently the visibility of pipe failures has increased with social media and 24-hour news coverage. In response, many utilities have adapted pipe asset management strategies to reduce failures. Also, many technologies have emerged that allow for a more proactive pipe asset management. As sustainability has become a focus for many organizations including utilities, the question becomes which pipe asset management strategy is most sustainable. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate three pipe asset management strategies for sustainability using Envision®. The strategies include: a reactive run-to-failure and then replace; a preemptive replacement prior to failure based on assumed condition; and a balanced approach of active condition assessment and action based on the known condition. Envision® will be used to evaluate each approach to determine its sustainability rating.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Matthews, J. C., Piratla, K., & Koo, D. D. (2016). Sustainability Evaluation of Pipe Asset Management Strategies. Procedia Engineering, 145, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.025
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Procedia Engineering
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}