Contemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelines

dc.contributor.authorRosenberger, Laura H.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Samantha M.
dc.contributor.authorNimbkar, Suniti N.
dc.contributor.authorHieken, Tina J.
dc.contributor.authorLudwig, Kandice K.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Lisa K.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Megan E.
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Kristalyn K.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Jasmine
dc.contributor.authorNeuman, Heather B.
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorHassinger, Taryn E.
dc.contributor.authorKing, Tari A.
dc.contributor.authorJakub, James W.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T15:21:00Z
dc.date.available2023-04-27T15:21:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare breast neoplasms, which have little granular data on margins. Current guidelines recommend ≥ 1 cm margins; however, recent data suggest narrower margins are sufficient, and for benign PT, a negative margin may not be necessary. Methods: We performed an 11-institution contemporary (2007-2017) review of PT practices. Demographics, surgical, and histopathologic data were captured. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of select covariates with local recurrence (LR). Results: Of 550 PT patients, the majority underwent excisional biopsy (55.3%, n = 302/546) or lumpectomy (wide excision) (38.5%, n = 210/546). Median tumor size was 30 mm, 68.9% (n = 379) were benign, 19.6% (n = 108) borderline, and 10.5% (n = 58) malignant. Surgical margins were positive in 42% (n = 231) and negative in 57.3% (n = 311). A second operation was performed in 38.0% (n = 209) of the total cohort, including 51 patients with an initial negative margin (82.4% with < 2 mm), and 157 with an initial positive margin, with residual disease only found in six (2.9%). Notably, 32.0% (n = 74) of those with an initial positive margin did not undergo a second operation, among whom only 2.7% (n = 2) recurred. Recurrence occurred in 3.3% (n = 18) of the total cohort (n = 15 LR, n = 3 distant), at median follow-up of 36.7 months. LR (all PT grades) was not reduced with wider negative margin width (≥ 2 mm v < 2 mm: odds ratio [OR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.07 to 2.10; P = .27) or final margin status (positive v negative: OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.26 to 3.52; P = .96). Conclusion: In current practice, many patients are managed outside of current guidelines. For the entire cohort, a wider margin width was not associated with a reduced risk of LR. We do not recommend re-excision of a negative margin for benign PT, regardless of margin width, as a progressively wider surgical margin is unlikely to reduce LR.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationRosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, et al. Contemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(3):178-189. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.02647en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32668
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1200/JCO.20.02647en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical Oncologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectBreast neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectMastectomyen_US
dc.subjectPhyllodes tumoren_US
dc.subjectTumor burdenen_US
dc.titleContemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelinesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462612/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
jco-39-178.pdf
Size:
251.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: