Extranodal extension of lymph node metastasis influences recurrence in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorLuchini, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorFleischmann, Achim
dc.contributor.authorBoormans, Joost L.
dc.contributor.authorFassan, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorNottegar, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorLucato, Paola
dc.contributor.authorStubbs, Brendon
dc.contributor.authorSolmi, Marco
dc.contributor.authorPorcaro, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorVeronese, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorBrunelli, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorScarpa, Aldo
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Liang
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T19:30:28Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T19:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-24
dc.description.abstractThe extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis involves the extension of neoplastic cells through the lymph node capsule into the perinodal adipose tissue. This morphological feature has recently been indicated as an important prognostic factor in various cancer types, but its role in prostate cancer is still unclear. We aimed to clarify it, performing the first meta-analysis on this issue, comparing prognostic parameters in surgically treated, node-positive prostate cancer patients with (ENE+) vs. without (ENE-) ENE. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) for number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), for the time-dependent risk related to ENE positivity. Six studies followed-up 1,113 patients with N1 prostate cancer (658 ENE+ vs. 455 ENE-) for a median of 83 months. The presence of ENE was associated with a significantly higher risk of biochemical recurrence (RR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.03-1.28; I2 = 0%; HR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.12-1.74; I2 = 0%) and "global" (biochemical recurrence and distant metastasis) recurrence (RR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.04-1.28; I2 = 0%; HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.14-1.74; I2 = 0%). ENE emerged as a potential prognostic moderator, earmarking a subgroup of patients at higher risk of recurrence. It may be considered for the prognostic stratification of metastatic patients. New possible therapeutic approaches may explore more in depth this prognostic parameter.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLuchini, C., Fleischmann, A., Boormans, J. L., Fassan, M., Nottegar, A., Lucato, P., … Cheng, L. (2017). Extranodal extension of lymph node metastasis influences recurrence in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 7, 2374. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02577-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/13918
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringerNatureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41598-017-02577-4en_US
dc.relation.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectExtranodal extension (ENE)en_US
dc.subjectNodal metastasisen_US
dc.subjectNeoplastic cellsen_US
dc.subjectProstate canceren_US
dc.subjectNode-positive prostate canceren_US
dc.titleExtranodal extension of lymph node metastasis influences recurrence in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
41598_2017_Article_2577.pdf
Size:
1.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: