FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation

dc.contributor.authorSoto, Luis A.
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Kerriann M.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jinghui
dc.contributor.authorBlaney, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorManjappa, Rakesh
dc.contributor.authorBreitkreutz, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorSkinner, Lawrie
dc.contributor.authorDutt, Suparna
dc.contributor.authorKo, Ryan B.
dc.contributor.authorBush, Karl
dc.contributor.authorYu, Amy S.
dc.contributor.authorMelemenidis, Stavros
dc.contributor.authorStrober, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorEnglemann, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorMaxim, Peter G.
dc.contributor.authorGraves, Edward E.
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Billy W., Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentRadiation Oncology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T17:29:35Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T17:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01
dc.description.abstractRadiation therapy, along with surgery and chemotherapy, is one of the main treatments for cancer. While radiotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of localized tumors, its main limitation is its toxicity to normal tissue. Previous preclinical studies have reported that ultra-high dose-rate (FLASH) irradiation results in reduced toxicity to normal tissues while controlling tumor growth to a similar extent relative to conventional-dose-rate (CONV) irradiation. To our knowledge this is the first report of a dose-response study in mice comparing the effect of FLASH irradiation vs. CONV irradiation on skin toxicity. We found that FLASH irradiation results in both a lower incidence and lower severity of skin ulceration than CONV irradiation 8 weeks after single-fraction hemithoracic irradiation at high doses (30 and 40 Gy). Survival was also higher after FLASH hemithoracic irradiation (median survival >180 days at doses of 30 and 40 Gy) compared to CONV irradiation (median survival 100 and 52 days at 30 and 40 Gy, respectively). No ulceration was observed at doses 20 Gy or below in either FLASH or CONV. These results suggest a shifting of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced skin ulceration to the right for FLASH, compared to CONV irradiation, suggesting the potential for an enhanced therapeutic index for radiation therapy of cancer.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSoto LA, Casey KM, Wang J, et al. FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation [published correction appears in Radiat Res. 2022 Feb 1;197(2):207]. Radiat Res. 2020;194(6):618-624. doi:10.1667/RADE-20-00090en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29135
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioOneen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1667/RADE-20-00090en_US
dc.relation.journalRadiation Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectExperimental radiation injuriesen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectRadiation dose-response relationshipen_US
dc.titleFLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1657027.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: