Analyzing Medication Documentation in Electronic Health Records: Dental Students’ Self-Reported Behaviors and Charting Practices

dc.contributor.authorBurcham, Wesley K.
dc.contributor.authorRomito, Laura M.
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorGitter, Bruce D.
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-10T18:58:59Z
dc.date.available2020-04-10T18:58:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this two-part study was to assess third- and fourth-year dental students’ perceptions, self-reported behaviors, and actual charting practices regarding medication documentation in axiUm, the electronic health record (EHR) system. In part one of the study, in fall 2015, all 125 third- and 85 fourth-year dental students at one U.S. dental school were invited to complete a ten-item anonymous survey on medication history-taking. In part two of the study, the EHRs of 519 recent dental school patients were randomly chosen via axiUm query based on age >21 years and the presence of at least one documented medication. Documentation completeness was assessed per EHR and each medication based on proper medication name, classification, dose/frequency, indication, potential oral effects, and correct medication spelling. Consistency was evaluated by identifying the presence/absence of a medical reason for each medication. The survey response rate was 90.6% (N=187). In total, 64.5% of responding students reported that taking a complete medication history is important and useful in enhancing pharmacology knowledge; 90.4% perceived it helped improve their understanding of patients’ medical conditions. The fourth-year students were more likely than the third-year students to value the latter (p=0.0236). Overall, 48.6% reported reviewing patient medications with clinic faculty 76-100% of the time. The respondents’ most frequently cited perceived barriers to medication documentation were patients’ not knowing their medications (68.5%) and, to a much lesser degree, axiUm limitations (14%). Proper medication name was most often recorded (93.6%), and potential oral effects were recorded the least (3.0%). Medication/medical condition consistency was 70.6%. In this study, most of the students perceived patient medication documentation as important; however, many did not appreciate the importance of all elements of a complete medication history, and complete medication documentation was low.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationBurcham, W. K., Romito, L. M., Moser, E. A., & Gitter, B. D. (2019). Analyzing Medication Documentation in Electronic Health Records: Dental Students’ Self-Reported Behaviors and Charting Practices. Journal of Dental Education, 83(6), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.070en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22536
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherADEAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.21815/JDE.019.070en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dental Educationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectdental educationen_US
dc.subjectdental studentsen_US
dc.subjectmedicationen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing Medication Documentation in Electronic Health Records: Dental Students’ Self-Reported Behaviors and Charting Practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Burcham_2019_Analyzing.pdf
Size:
7.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: