Improving the validity of activity of daily living dependency risk assessment

Date
2015-04
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
SAGE Publications
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Efforts to prevent activity of daily living (ADL) dependency may be improved through models that assess older adults' dependency risk. We evaluated whether cognition and gait speed measures improve the predictive validity of interview-based models. METHOD: Participants were 8,095 self-respondents in the 2006 Health and Retirement Survey who were aged 65 years or over and independent in five ADLs. Incident ADL dependency was determined from the 2008 interview. Models were developed using random 2/3rd cohorts and validated in the remaining 1/3rd. RESULTS: Compared to a c-statistic of 0.79 in the best interview model, the model including cognitive measures had c-statistics of 0.82 and 0.80 while the best fitting gait speed model had c-statistics of 0.83 and 0.79 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two relatively brief models, one that requires an in-person assessment and one that does not, had excellent validity for predicting incident ADL dependency but did not significantly improve the predictive validity of the best fitting interview-based models.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Clark, D. O., Stump, T. E., Tu, W., & Miller, D. K. (2015). Improving the Validity of Activity of Daily Living Dependency Risk Assessment. Journal of Applied Gerontology : The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 34(3), 329–342. http://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812471894
ISSN
1552-4523
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}